The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shape context and chamfer matching in cluttered scenes
Abstract
This paper compares two methods for object localization from contours: shape context and chamfer matching of templates. In the light of our experiments, we suggest improvements to the shape context: shape contexts are used to find corresponding features between model and image. In real images it is shown that the shape context is highly influenced by clutters; furthermore, even when the object is correctly localized, the feature correspondence may be poor. We show that the robustness of shape matching can be increased by including a figural continuity constraint. The combined shape and continuity cost is minimized using the Viterbi algorithm on features, resulting in improved localization and correspondence. Our algorithm can be generally applied to any feature based shape matching method. Chamfer matching correlates model templates with the distance transform of the edge image. This can be done efficiently using a coarse-to-fine search over the transformation parameters. The method is robust in clutter, however, multiple templates are needed to handle scale, rotation and shape variation. We compare both methods for locating hand shapes in cluttered images, and applied to word recognition in EZ-Gimpy images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration
Chui, H., & Rangarajan, A. (2003) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/s1077-3142(03)00009-2 · Cited by 1,560
Cited by
Romero (2017) · doi:10.1145/3130800.3130883 · Cited by 1,056
Diffusion Distance for Histogram Comparison
Ling, H., & Okada, K. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.99 · Cited by 222
Grauman, K., & Leibe, B. (2011) · Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · doi:10.2200/s00332ed1v01y201103aim011 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Thayananthan, A., Stenger, B., Torr, P. H. S., & Cipolla, R.
- Venue
- 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-11-04
- Pages
- I-127-I-133
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148821982
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shape context and chamfer matching in cluttered scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2003.1211346
- The paper
- Thayananthan, A., Stenger, B., Torr, P. H. S., & Cipolla, R. (2003). Shape context and chamfer matching in cluttered scenes. 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2003.1211346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.