The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Sparse Object Category Model for Efficient Learning and Exhaustive Recognition
Abstract
We present a "parts and structure" model for object category recognition that can be learnt efficiently and in a semi-supervised manner: the model is learnt from example images containing category instances, without requiring segmentation from background clutter. The model is a sparse representation of the object, and consists of a star topology configuration of parts modeling the output of a variety of feature detectors. The optimal choice of feature types (whose repertoire includes interest points, curves and regions) is made automatically. In recognition, the model may be applied efficiently in an exhaustive manner, bypassing the need for feature detectors, to give the globally optimal match within a query image. The approach is demonstrated on a wide variety of categories, and delivers both successful classification and localization of the object within the image.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors
Ke, Y., & Sukthankar, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206 · Cited by 3,237
The Representation and Matching of Pictorial Structures
Fischler, M. A., & Elschlager, R. A. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/t-c.1973.223602 · Cited by 1,322
Cited by
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
One-shot learning of object categories
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.79 · Cited by 3,029
Self-citationRobust Object Detection with Interleaved Categorization and Segmentation
Leibe, B., Leonardis, A., & Schiele, B. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0095-3 · Cited by 933
Keypoint recognition using randomized trees
Lepetit, V., & Fua, P. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.188 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Fergus, R., Perona, P., & Zisserman, A.
- Venue
- 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005-07-27
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 380-387
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105488551
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
