The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised Bayesian Detection of Independent Motion in Crowds
Abstract
While crowds of various subjects may offer applicationspecific cues to detect individuals, we demonstrate that for the general case, motion itself contains more information than previously exploited. This paper describes an unsupervised data driven Bayesian clustering algorithm which has detection of individual entities as its primary goal. We track simple image features and probabilistically group them into clusters representing independently moving entities. The numbers of clusters and the grouping of constituent features are determined without supervised learning or any subject-specific model. The new approach is instead, that space-time proximity and trajectory coherence through image space are used as the only probabilistic criteria for clustering. An important contribution of this work is how these criteria are used to perform a one-shot data association without iterating through combinatorial hypotheses of cluster assignments. Our proposed general detection algorithm can be augmented with subject-specific filtering, but is shown to already be effective at detecting individual entities in crowds of people, insects, and animals. This paper and the associated video examine the implementation and experiments of our motion clustering framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection
Rosten, E., & Drummond, T. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_34 · Cited by 4,555
Cited by
You'll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking
Pellegrini, S., Ess, A., Schindler, K., & van Gool, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459260 · Cited by 1,683
Cross-scene crowd counting via deep convolutional neural networks
Zhang, C., Li, H., Wang, X., & Yang, X. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298684 · Cited by 1,121
Multiple Object Tracking Using K-Shortest Paths Optimization
Berclaz, J., Fleuret, F., Turetken, E., & Fua, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.21 · Cited by 1,015
Floor Fields for Tracking in High Density Crowd Scenes
Ali, S., & Shah, M. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_1 · Cited by 388
COUNT Forest: CO-Voting Uncertain Number of Targets Using Random Forest for Crowd Density Estimation
Pham, V.-Q., Kozakaya, T., Yamaguchi, O., & Okada, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.372 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Brostow, G. J., & Cipolla, R.
- Venue
- 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-07-10
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 594-601
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096229530
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.