The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing Binary MRFs via Extended Roof Duality
Abstract
Many computer vision applications rely on the efficient optimization of challenging, so-called non-submodular, binary pairwise MRFs. A promising graph cut based approach for optimizing such MRFs known as "roof duality" was recently introduced into computer vision. We study two methods which extend this approach. First, we discuss an efficient implementation of the "probing" technique introduced recently by Bows et al. (2006). It simplifies the MRF while preserving the global optimum. Our code is 400-700 faster on some graphs than the implementation of the work of Bows et al. (2006). Second, we present a new technique which takes an arbitrary input labeling and tries to improve its energy. We give theoretical characterizations of local minima of this procedure. We applied both techniques to many applications, including image segmentation, new view synthesis, super-resolution, diagram recognition, parameter learning, texture restoration, and image deconvolution. For several applications we see that we are able to find the global minimum very efficiently, and considerably outperform the original roof duality approach. In comparison to existing techniques, such as graph cut, TRW, BP, ICM, and simulated annealing, we nearly always find a lower energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Boros, E., & Hammer, P. L. (2002) · Discrete Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0166-218x(01)00341-9 · Cited by 827
Cited by
Object scene flow for autonomous vehicles
Menze, M., & Geiger, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298925 · Cited by 2,270
Anticipating Human Activities Using Object Affordances for Reactive Robotic Response
Koppula, H. S., & Saxena, A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2430335 · Cited by 596
Optical flow modeling and computation: A survey
Fortun, D., Bouthemy, P., & Kervrann, C. (2015) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2015.02.008 · Cited by 431
Feature Correspondence Via Graph Matching: Models and Global Optimization
Torresani, L., Kolmogorov, V., & Rother, C. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_44 · Cited by 388
Self-citationA Comparative Study of Energy Minimization Methods for Markov Random Fields
Szeliski, R., Zabih, R., Scharstein, D., Veksler, O., Kolmogorov, V., Agarwala, A., Tappen, M., & Rother, C. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744047_2 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rother, C., Kolmogorov, V., Lempitsky, V., & Szummer, M.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007-06
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137117160
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing Binary MRFs via Extended Roof Duality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2007.383203
- The paper
- Rother, C., Kolmogorov, V., Lempitsky, V., & Szummer, M. (2007). Optimizing Binary MRFs via Extended Roof Duality. 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2007.383203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.