The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks
Abstract
The notion of using context information for solving high-level vision problems has been increasingly realized in the field. However, how to learn an effective and efficient context model, together with the image appearance, remains mostly unknown. The current literature using Markov Random Fields (MRFs) and Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) often involves specific algorithm design, in which the modeling and computing stages are studied in isolation. In this paper, we propose an auto-context algorithm. Given a set of training images and their corresponding label maps, we first learn a classifier on local image patches. The discriminative probability (or classification confidence) maps by the learned classifier are then used as context information, in addition to the original image patches, to train a new classifier. The algorithm then iterates to approach the ground truth. Auto-context learns an integrated low-level and context model, and is very general and easy to implement. Under nearly the identical parameter setting in the training, we apply the algorithm on three challenging vision applications: object segmentation, human body configuration, and scene region labeling. It typically takes about 30 ∼ 70 seconds to run the algorithm in testing. Moreover, the scope of the proposed algorithm goes beyond high-level vision. It has the potential to be used for a wide variety of problems of multi-variate labeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884
Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts
Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.993558 · Cited by 6,306
Tu, Z. (2005) · Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1 · doi:10.1109/iccv.2005.194 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks
Zheng, S., Jayasumana, S., Romera-Paredes, B., Vineet, V., Su, Z., Du, D., Huang, C., & Torr, P. H. S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.179 · Cited by 2,386
“Lack of such smoothness constraints can result in poor object delineation and small spurious regions in the segmentation output [31, 30, 14, 21].”
BackgroundRelation Networks for Object Detection
Hu, H., Gu, J., Zhang, Z., Dai, J., & Wei, Y. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00378 · Cited by 1,524
Zhou, X., Koltun, V., & Krähenbühl, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58548-8_28 · Cited by 1,428
Human Pose Estimation with Iterative Error Feedback
Carreira, J., Agrawal, P., Fragkiadaki, K., & Malik, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.512 · Cited by 805
Holistically-nested edge detection
Xie, S., & Tu, Z. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-017-1004-z · Cited by 682
Metadata
- Authors
- Tu, Z.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-06
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122006243
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587436
- The paper
- Tu, Z. (2008). Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks. 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.