The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global data association for multi-object tracking using network flows
Abstract
We propose a network flow based optimization method for data association needed for multiple object tracking. The maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) data association problem is mapped into a cost-flow network with a non-overlap constraint on trajectories. The optimal data association is found by a min-cost flow algorithm in the network. The network is augmented to include an Explicit Occlusion Model(EOM) to track with long-term inter-object occlusions. A solution to the EOM-based network is found by an iterative approach built upon the original algorithm. Initialization and termination of trajectories and potential false observations are modeled by the formulation intrinsically. The method is efficient and does not require hypotheses pruning. Performance is compared with previous results on two public pedestrian datasets to show its improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An algorithm for tracking multiple targets
Reid, D. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102177 · Cited by 3,059
Multiple Target Tracking Using Spatio-Temporal Markov Chain Monte Carlo Data Association
Yu, Q., Medioni, G., & Cohen, I. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.382991 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric
Wojke, N., Bewley, A., & Paulus, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2017.8296962 · Cited by 5,286
You'll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking
Pellegrini, S., Ess, A., Schindler, K., & van Gool, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459260 · Cited by 1,683
FairMOT: On the Fairness of Detection and Re-identification in Multiple Object Tracking
Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Wang, X., Zeng, W., & Liu, W. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-021-01513-4 · Cited by 1,861
Visual Tracking: An Experimental Survey
(2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.230 · Cited by 1,513
MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Tracking
Milan, A., Leal-Taixe, L., Reid, I., Roth, S., & Schindler, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.00831 · Cited by 1,309
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Li, Y., & Nevatia, R.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-06
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111644456
- Cited by
- 925
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global data association for multi-object tracking using network flows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587584
- The paper
- Zhang, L., Li, Y., & Nevatia, R. (2008). Global data association for multi-object tracking using network flows. 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
