Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large displacement optical flow

Brox, Thomas, Bregler, Christoph, Malik, Jitendra·2009·2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

The literature currently provides two ways to establish point correspondences between images with moving objects. On one side, there are energy minimization methods that yield very accurate, dense flow fields, but fail as displacements get too large. On the other side, there is descriptor matching that allows for large displacements, but correspondences are very sparse, have limited accuracy, and due to missing regularity constraints there are many outliers. In this paper we propose a method that can combine the advantages of both matching strategies. A region hierarchy is established for both images. Descriptor matching on these regions provides a sparse set of hypotheses for correspondences. These are integrated into a variational approach and guide the local optimization to large displacement solutions. The variational optimization selects among the hypotheses and provides dense and subpixel accurate estimates, making use of geometric constraints and all available image information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206697

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1561/0600000017 · DOI · Paper page
  2. wills, 2004, A feature based method for determining dense long range correspondences, Proc ECCV, 3023, 170
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383205 · DOI
  4. strecha, 2004, A propabilistic approach to large displacement optical flow and occlusion detection, Statistical Methods in Video Processing, 3247, 71, 10.1007/978-3-540-30212-4_7 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/83.668027 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587420 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1273918 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1006/cviu.1996.0006 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/ICCV.2005.61 · DOI
  11. baker, 2007, A database and evaluation methodology for optical flow, Proc ICCV
  12. 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206707 · DOI · Paper page
  13. lucas, 1981, An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision, Proc Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 674
  14. laptev, 2004, Local Spatio-temporal Image Features for Motion Interpretation
  15. 10.1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238420 · DOI · Paper page
  17. brox, 2004, High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping, Proc ECCV, 25
  18. liu, 2008, SIFT flow: Dense correspondence across different scenes, Proc ECCV, 28

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brox, T., Bregler, C., & Malik, J.
Venue
2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-06
Pages
41-48
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171857946
Cited by
277
References
2
FWCI
20.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.