The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards total scene understanding: Classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework
Abstract
Given an image, we propose a hierarchical generative model that classifies the overall scene, recognizes and segments each object component, as well as annotates the image with a list of tags. To our knowledge, this is the first model that performs all three tasks in one coherent framework. For instance, a scene of a `polo game' consists of several visual objects such as `human', `horse', `grass', etc. In addition, it can be further annotated with a list of more abstract (e.g. `dusk') or visually less salient (e.g. `saddle') tags. Our generative model jointly explains images through a visual model and a textual model. Visually relevant objects are represented by regions and patches, while visually irrelevant textual annotations are influenced directly by the overall scene class. We propose a fully automatic learning framework that is able to learn robust scene models from noisy Web data such as images and user tags from Flickr.com. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by automatically classifying, annotating and segmenting images from eight classes depicting sport scenes. In all three tasks, our model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015
Cited by
Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · Cited by 4,902
Self-citationYFCC100M: the new data in multimedia research
Thomee, B., Shamma, D. A., Friedland, G., Elizalde, B., Ni, K., Poland, D., Borth, D., & Li, L.-J. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2812802 · Cited by 1,541
Self-citation(2011) · Cited by 1,192
Image retrieval using scene graphs
Johnson, J., Krishna, R., Stark, M., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., Bernstein, M. S., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298990 · Cited by 1,101
Self-citationDeep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2598339 · Cited by 1,048
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L.-J., Socher, R., & Fei-Fei, L.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-06
- Pages
- 2036-2043
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106624428
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.34
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards total scene understanding: Classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206718
- The paper
- Li, L.-J., Socher, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009). Towards total scene understanding: Classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.