The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual tracking decomposition
Abstract
We propose a novel tracking algorithm that can work robustly in a challenging scenario such that several kinds of appearance and motion changes of an object occur at the same time. Our algorithm is based on a visual tracking decomposition scheme for the efficient design of observation and motion models as well as trackers. In our scheme, the observation model is decomposed into multiple basic observation models that are constructed by sparse principal component analysis (SPCA) of a set of feature templates. Each basic observation model covers a specific appearance of the object. The motion model is also represented by the combination of multiple basic motion models, each of which covers a different type of motion. Then the multiple basic trackers are designed by associating the basic observation models and the basic motion models, so that each specific tracker takes charge of a certain change in the object. All basic trackers are then integrated into one compound tracker through an interactive Markov Chain Monte Carlo (IMCMC) framework in which the basic trackers communicate with one another interactively while run in parallel. By exchanging information with others, each tracker further improves its performance, which results in increasing the whole performance of tracking. Experimental results show that our method tracks the object accurately and reliably in realistic videos where the appearance and motion are drastically changing over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking
Ross, D. A., Lim, J., Lin, R.-S., & Yang, M.-H. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0075-7 · Cited by 3,061
Cited by
Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.312 · Cited by 4,138
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2388226 · Cited by 3,371
Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., & Matas, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.239 · Cited by 3,285
MEEM: Robust Tracking via Multiple Experts Using Entropy Minimization
Zhang, J., Ma, S., & Sclaroff, S. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_13 · Cited by 1,117
Robust object tracking via sparsity-based collaborative model
Zhong, W., Lu, H., & Yang, M.-H. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247882 · Cited by 990
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwon, J., & Lee, K. M.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Pages
- 1269-1276
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098854771
- Cited by
- 1,164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual tracking decomposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539821
- The paper
- Kwon, J., & Lee, K. M. (2010). Visual tracking decomposition. 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.