A study on continuous max-flow and min-cut approaches
Open accessAbstract
We propose and study novel max-flow models in the continuous setting, which directly map the discrete graph-based max-flow problem to its continuous optimization formulation. We show such a continuous max-flow model leads to an equivalent min-cut problem in a natural way, as the corresponding dual model. In this regard, we revisit basic conceptions used in discrete max-flow / min-cut models and give their new explanations from a variational perspective. We also propose corresponding continuous max-flow and min-cut models constrained by priori supervised information and apply them to interactive image segmentation/labeling problems. We prove that the proposed continuous max-flow and min-cut models, with or without supervised constraints, give rise to a series of global binary solutions λ*(x) ϵ {0,1}, which globally solves the original nonconvex image partitioning problems. In addition, we propose novel and reliable multiplier-based max-flow algorithms. Their convergence is guaranteed by classical optimization theories. Experiments on image segmentation, unsupervised and supervised, validate the effectiveness of the discussed continuous max-flow and min-cut models and suggested max-flow based algorithms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CRFs have been widely used to enhance segmentation accuracy by introducing spatial consistency.
“Graphical models such as CRFs [22], [42], [43] have been widely used to enhance segmentation accuracy by introducing spatial consistency.”
From DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentation (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
Continuous max-flow can also be used for the minimization, but its parameters are manually designed.
“Continuous max-flow [43] can also be used for the minimization, but its parameters are manually designed.”
From DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentation (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
Boros, E., & Hammer, P. L. (2002) · Discrete Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0166-218x(01)00341-9 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentation
Wang, G., Zuluaga, M. A., Li, W., Pratt, R., Patel, P. A., Aertsen, M., Doel, T., David, A. L., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2840695 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
“Graphical models such as CRFs [12], [41], [42] have been widely used to enhance segmentation accuracy by introducing spatial consistency.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Yuan, J., Bae, E., & Tai, X.-C.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Pages
- 2217-2224
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142761958
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Image Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- minimum cut, graph cuts, variational model, dual formulation, interactive segmentation, image annotation, non-convex optimization, image segmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review