The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
P-N learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints
Open accessAbstract
This paper shows that the performance of a binary classifier can be significantly improved by the processing of structured unlabeled data, i.e. data are structured if knowing the label of one example restricts the labeling of the others. We propose a novel paradigm for training a binary classifier from labeled and unlabeled examples that we call P-N learning. The learning process is guided by positive (P) and negative (N) constraints which restrict the labeling of the unlabeled set. P-N learning evaluates the classifier on the unlabeled data, identifies examples that have been classified in contradiction with structural constraints and augments the training set with the corrected samples in an iterative process. We propose a theory that formulates the conditions under which P-N learning guarantees improvement of the initial classifier and validate it on synthetic and real data. P-N learning is applied to the problem of on-line learning of object detector during tracking. We show that an accurate object detector can be learned from a single example and an unlabeled video sequence where the object may occur. The algorithm is compared with related approaches and state-of-the-art is achieved on a variety of objects (faces, pedestrians, cars, motorbikes and animals).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM
Nigam, K., Mccallum, A. K., Thrun, S., & Mitchell, T. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007692713085 · Cited by 2,736
Cited by
Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.312 · Cited by 4,138
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2388226 · Cited by 3,371
Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., & Matas, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.239 · Cited by 3,285
Self-citationECO: Efficient Convolution Operators for Tracking
Danelljan, M., Bhat, G., Khan, F. S., & Felsberg, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.733 · Cited by 2,805
Accurate Scale Estimation for Robust Visual Tracking
Danelljan, M., Häger, G., Shahbaz Khan, F., & Felsberg, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014 · doi:10.5244/c.28.65 · Cited by 2,087
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalal, Z., Matas, J., & Mikolajczyk, K.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Pages
- 49-56
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147533695
- Cited by
- 1,023
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 68.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P-N learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540231
- The paper
- Kalal, Z., Matas, J., & Mikolajczyk, K. (2010). P-N learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints. 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.