The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Action recognition using context and appearance distribution features
Abstract
We first propose a new spatio-temporal context distribution feature of interest points for human action recognition. Each action video is expressed as a set of relative XYT coordinates between pairwise interest points in a local region. We learn a global GMM (referred to as Universal Background Model, UBM) using the relative coordinate features from all the training videos, and then represent each video as the normalized parameters of a video-specific GMM adapted from the global GMM. In order to capture the spatio-temporal relationships at different levels, multiple GMMs are utilized to describe the context distributions of interest points over multi-scale local regions. To describe the appearance information of an action video, we also propose to use GMM to characterize the distribution of local appearance features from the cuboids centered around the interest points. Accordingly, an action video can be represented by two types of distribution features: 1) multiple GMM distributions of spatio-temporal context; 2) GMM distribution of local video appearance. To effectively fuse these two types of heterogeneous and complementary distribution features, we additionally propose a new learning algorithm, called Multiple Kernel Learning with Augmented Features (AFMKL), to learn an adapted classifier based on multiple kernels and the pre-learned classifiers of other action classes. Extensive experiments on KTH, multi-view IXMAS and complex UCF sports datasets demonstrate that our method generally achieves higher recognition accuracy than other state-of-the-art methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Wang, D. (2016) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 · Cited by 6,260
Dense Trajectories and Motion Boundary Descriptors for Action Recognition
Wang, H., Kläser, A., Schmid, C., & Liu, C.-L. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-012-0594-8 · Cited by 1,669
A Review of Human Activity Recognition Methods
Vrigkas, M., Nikou, C., & Kakadiaris, I. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2015.00028 · Cited by 566
Domain Transfer Multiple Kernel Learning
Duan, L., Tsang, I. W., & Xu, D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.114 · Cited by 548
Self-citationHierarchical Clustering Multi-Task Learning for Joint Human Action Grouping and Recognition
Liu, A.-A., Su, Y.-T., Nie, W.-Z., & Kankanhalli, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2537337 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, X., Xu, D., Duan, L., & Luo, J.
- Venue
- CVPR 2011
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-06
- Pages
- 489-496
- OpenAlex
- W2152556536
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action recognition using context and appearance distribution features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995624
- The paper
- Wu, X., Xu, D., Duan, L., & Luo, J. (2011). Action recognition using context and appearance distribution features. CVPR 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.