The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boosting bottom-up and top-down visual features for saliency estimation
Abstract
Despite significant recent progress, the best available visual saliency models still lag behind human performance in predicting eye fixations in free-viewing of natural scenes. Majority of models are based on low-level visual features and the importance of top-down factors has not yet been fully explored or modeled. Here, we combine low-level features such as orientation, color, intensity, saliency maps of previous best bottom-up models with top-down cognitive visual features (e.g., faces, humans, cars, etc.) and learn a direct mapping from those features to eye fixations using Regression, SVM, and AdaBoost classifiers. By extensive experimenting over three benchmark eye-tracking datasets using three popular evaluation scores, we show that our boosting model outperforms 27 state-of-the-art models and is so far the closest model to the accuracy of human model for fixation prediction. Furthermore, our model successfully detects the most salient object in a scene without sophisticated image processings such as region segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Cited by
Salient Object Detection: A Benchmark
Borji, A., Cheng, M.-M., Jiang, H., & Li, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2487833 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citationSalient Object Detection: A Discriminative Regional Feature Integration Approach
Jiang, H., Wang, J., Yuan, Z., Wu, Y., Zheng, N., & Li, S. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.271 · Cited by 1,147
Advanced Deep-Learning Techniques for Salient and Category-Specific Object Detection: A Survey
Han, J., Zhang, D., Cheng, G., Liu, N., & Xu, D. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2749125 · Cited by 621
Predicting Human Eye Fixations via an LSTM-Based Saliency Attentive Model
Cornia, M., Baraldi, L., Serra, G., & Cucchiara, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2851672 · Cited by 474
Background Prior-Based Salient Object Detection via Deep Reconstruction Residual
Han, J., Zhang, D., Hu, X., Guo, L., Ren, J., & Wu, F. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2014.2381471 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Borji, A.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 438-445
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158983298
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boosting bottom-up and top-down visual features for saliency estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247706
- The paper
- Borji, A. (2012). Boosting bottom-up and top-down visual features for saliency estimation. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.