Saliency Detection via Graph-Based Manifold Ranking
Abstract
Most existing bottom-up methods measure the foreground saliency of a pixel or region based on its contrast within a local context or the entire image, whereas a few methods focus on segmenting out background regions and thereby salient objects. Instead of considering the contrast between the salient objects and their surrounding regions, we consider both foreground and background cues in a different way. We rank the similarity of the image elements (pixels or regions) with foreground cues or background cues via graph-based manifold ranking. The saliency of the image elements is defined based on their relevances to the given seeds or queries. We represent the image as a close-loop graph with super pixels as nodes. These nodes are ranked based on the similarity to background and foreground queries, based on affinity matrices. Saliency detection is carried out in a two-stage scheme to extract background regions and foreground salient objects efficiently. Experimental results on two large benchmark databases demonstrate the proposed method performs well when against the state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy and speed. We also create a more difficult benchmark database containing 5,172 images to test the proposed saliency model and make this database publicly available with this paper for further studies in the saliency field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The receptive field of Transformer based models covers the entire input space.
“The receptive field of Transformer based models covers the entire input space, a property that resembles handcrafted features [25], but ViTs have higher representative capacity.”
From Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 2,554
- Authors
- Yang, C., Zhang, L., Lu, H., Ruan, X., & Yang, M.-H.
- Affiliations
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Omron (Japan) (JP)
- University of California, Merced (US)
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-06
- Pages
- 3166-3173
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039313011
- Cited by
- 2,554
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 187 · 2023: 201 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 304 · 2018: 247 · 2017: 262 · 2016: 210 · 2015: 171 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 97.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- saliency detection, superpixels, affinity matrix, salient object detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review