Cited by 2,554Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Saliency Detection via Graph-Based Manifold Ranking

Yang, Chuan, Zhang, Lihe, Lu, Huchuan, Ruan, Xiang, Yang, Ming-Hsuan·2013·2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Most existing bottom-up methods measure the foreground saliency of a pixel or region based on its contrast within a local context or the entire image, whereas a few methods focus on segmenting out background regions and thereby salient objects. Instead of considering the contrast between the salient objects and their surrounding regions, we consider both foreground and background cues in a different way. We rank the similarity of the image elements (pixels or regions) with foreground cues or background cues via graph-based manifold ranking. The saliency of the image elements is defined based on their relevances to the given seeds or queries. We represent the image as a close-loop graph with super pixels as nodes. These nodes are ranked based on the similarity to background and foreground queries, based on affinity matrices. Saliency detection is carried out in a two-stage scheme to extract background regions and foreground salient objects efficiently. Experimental results on two large benchmark databases demonstrate the proposed method performs well when against the state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy and speed. We also create a more difficult benchmark database containing 5,172 images to test the proposed saliency model and make this database publicly available with this paper for further studies in the saliency field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2013.407

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The receptive field of Transformer based models covers the entire input space.

    “The receptive field of Transformer based models covers the entire input space, a property that resembles handcrafted features [25], but ViTs have higher representative capacity.”

    From Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 2,554

Authors
Yang, C., Zhang, L., Lu, H., Ruan, X., & Yang, M.-H.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Omron (Japan) (JP)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Venue
2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-06
Pages
3166-3173
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039313011
Cited by
2,554
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 187 · 2023: 201 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 304 · 2018: 247 · 2017: 262 · 2016: 210 · 2015: 171 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
97.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
saliency detection, superpixels, affinity matrix, salient object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review