The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images
Abstract
Saliency prediction typically relies on hand-crafted (multiscale) features that are combined in different ways to form a "master" saliency map, which encodes local image conspicuity. Recent improvements to the state of the art on standard benchmarks such as MIT1003 have been achieved mostly by incrementally adding more and more hand-tuned features (such as car or face detectors) to existing models. In contrast, we here follow an entirely automatic data-driven approach that performs a large-scale search for optimal features. We identify those instances of a richly-parameterized bio-inspired model family (hierarchical neuromorphic networks) that successfully predict image saliency. Because of the high dimensionality of this parameter space, we use automated hyperparameter optimization to efficiently guide the search. The optimal blend of such multilayer features combined with a simple linear classifier achieves excellent performance on several image saliency benchmarks. Our models outperform the state of the art on MIT1003, on which features and classifiers are learned. Without additional training, these models generalize well to two other image saliency data sets, Toronto and NUSEF, despite their different image content. Finally, our algorithm scores best of all the 23 models evaluated to date on the MIT300 saliency challenge, which uses a hidden test set to facilitate an unbiased comparison.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Pinto, N., Doukhan, D., DiCarlo, J. J., & Cox, D. D. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000579 · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Cited by
Recent advances in convolutional neural networks
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., Liu, T., Wang, X., Wang, G., Cai, J., et al. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · Cited by 6,576
Object Detection With Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, Z.-Q., Zheng, P., Xu, S.-T., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2876865 · Cited by 5,545
Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications
Wang, J., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Gao, R. X., & Wu, D. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003 · Cited by 1,740
DeepFix: A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Predicting Human Eye Fixations
Kruthiventi, S. S. S., Ayush, K., & Babu, R. V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2710620 · Cited by 478
A Deep Network Solution for Attention and Aesthetics Aware Photo Cropping
Wang, W., Shen, J., & Ling, H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2840724 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Vig, E., Dorr, M., & Cox, D.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-06
- Pages
- 2798-2805
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078903912
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2014.358
- The paper
- Vig, E., Dorr, M., & Cox, D. (2014). Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2014.358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.