Interleaved text/image Deep Mining on a large-scale radiology database
Abstract
Despite tremendous progress in computer vision, effective learning on very large-scale (> 100K patients) medical image databases has been vastly hindered. We present an interleaved text/image deep learning system to extract and mine the semantic interactions of radiology images and reports from a national research hospital's picture archiving and communication system. Instead of using full 3D medical volumes, we focus on a collection of representative ~216K 2D key images/slices (selected by clinicians for diagnostic reference) with text-driven scalar and vector labels. Our system interleaves between unsupervised learning (e.g., latent Dirichlet allocation, recurrent neural net language models) on document- and sentence-level texts to generate semantic labels and supervised learning via deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to map from images to label spaces. Disease-related key words can be predicted for radiology images in a retrieval manner. We have demonstrated promising quantitative and qualitative results. The large-scale datasets of extracted key images and their categorization, embedded vector labels and sentence descriptions can be harnessed to alleviate the deep learning “data-hungry” obstacle in the medical domain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transfer learning in CNN representation can be effective in various cross-modality imaging settings, including RGB to depth images, natural images to general CT and MRI images, natural images to neuroimaging, and natural images to ultrasound data.
“Finally, transfer learning in CNN representation, as empirically verified in previous literature [59]–[61], [11], [62] can be effective in various cross-modality imaging settings (RGB images to depth images [59], [60], natural images to general CT and MRI images [11], and natural images to neuroimaging [61] or ultrasound [62] data).”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Shin, H.-C., Lu, L., Kim, L., Seff, A., Yao, J., & Summers, R. M.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-06
- Pages
- 1090-1099
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1908709347
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- radiology reports, latent Dirichlet allocation, language models, convolutional neural networks, PACS
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review