The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On learning optimized reaction diffusion processes for effective image restoration
Open accessAbstract
For several decades, image restoration remains an active research topic in low-level computer vision and hence new approaches are constantly emerging. However, many recently proposed algorithms achieve state-of-the-art performance only at the expense of very high computation time, which clearly limits their practical relevance. In this work, we propose a simple but effective approach with both high computational efficiency and high restoration quality. We extend conventional nonlinear reaction diffusion models by several parametrized linear filters as well as several parametrized influence functions. We propose to train the parameters of the filters and the influence functions through a loss based approach. Experiments show that our trained nonlinear reaction diffusion models largely benefit from the training of the parameters and finally lead to the best reported performance on common test datasets for image restoration. Due to their structural simplicity, our trained models are highly efficient and are also well-suited for parallel computation on GPUs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising
Gu, S., Zhang, L., Zuo, W., & Feng, X. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.366 · Cited by 2,316
Shrinkage Fields for Effective Image Restoration
Schmidt, U., & Roth, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.349 · Cited by 543
Training an Active Random Field for Real-Time Image Denoising
Barbu, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2009.2028254 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., & Zhang, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2662206 · Cited by 8,983
Self-citationDeep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529
“operator)? Although the authors of [32] began to address this connection, they only assumed that the filters learned in”
BackgroundMethodChen, Y., & Pock, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2596743 · Cited by 1,344
Self-citationISTA-Net: Interpretable Optimization-Inspired Deep Network for Image Compressive Sensing
Zhang, J., & Ghanem, B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00196 · Cited by 1,309
A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low‐dose X‐ray CT reconstruction
Kang, E., Min, J., & Ye, J. C. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12344 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Yu, W., & Pock, T.
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-06
- Pages
- 5261-5269
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1915360731
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On learning optimized reaction diffusion processes for effective image restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299163
- The paper
- Chen, Y., Yu, W., & Pock, T. (2015). On learning optimized reaction diffusion processes for effective image restoration. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.