The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simultaneous Optical Flow and Intensity Estimation from an Event Camera
Abstract
Event cameras are bio-inspired vision sensors which mimic retinas to measure per-pixel intensity change rather than outputting an actual intensity image. This proposed paradigm shift away from traditional frame cameras offers significant potential advantages: namely avoiding high data rates, dynamic range limitations and motion blur. Unfortunately, however, established computer vision algorithms may not at all be applied directly to event cameras. Methods proposed so far to reconstruct images, estimate optical flow, track a camera and reconstruct a scene come with severe restrictions on the environment or on the motion of the camera, e.g. allowing only rotation. Here, we propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first algorithm to simultaneously recover the motion field and brightness image, while the camera undergoes a generic motion through any scene. Our approach employs minimisation of a cost function that contains the asynchronous event data as well as spatial and temporal regularisation within a sliding window time interval. Our implementation relies on GPU optimisation and runs in near real-time. In a series of examples, we demonstrate the successful operation of our framework, including in situations where conventional cameras suffer from dynamic range limitations and motion blur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LSD-SLAM: Large-scale direct monocular SLAM
Engel, J., Schöps, T., & Cremers, D. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_54 · Cited by 3,851
A 128$\times$128 120 dB 15 $\mu$s Latency Asynchronous Temporal Contrast Vision Sensor
Lichtsteiner, P., Posch, C., & Delbruck, T. (2008) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2007.914337 · Cited by 2,485
DTAM: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time
Newcombe, R. A., Lovegrove, S. J., & Davison, A. J. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126513 · Cited by 2,078 · cited 3×
“As systems like LSD-SLAM [8] very clearly highlight, pixels where edges move are the only ones which give information useful for tracking and reconstruction, and it is precisely these locations which are highlighted in hardware by an event camera.”
MethodSelf-citationA Duality Based Approach for Realtime TV-L 1 Optical Flow
Zach, C., Pock, T., & Bischof, H. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74936-3_22 · Cited by 1,658 · cited 3×
“Our algorithm is formulated as sliding window variational optimisation, and has much in common with well known variational methods for estimating two-view optical flow from standard video [11, 24].”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Gallego, G., Delbruck, T., Orchard, G., Bartolozzi, C., Taba, B., Censi, A., Leutenegger, S., Davison, A. J., Conradt, J., Daniilidis, K., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3008413 · Cited by 2,566
Self-citationEV-FlowNet: Self-Supervised Optical Flow Estimation for Event-based Cameras
Zhu, A., Yuan, L., Chaney, K., & Daniilidis, K. (2018) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIV · doi:10.15607/rss.2018.xiv.062 · Cited by 470
Real-Time 3D Reconstruction and 6-DoF Tracking with an Event Camera
Kim, H., Leutenegger, S., & Davison, A. J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_21 · Cited by 438
Self-citationEvents-To-Video: Bringing Modern Computer Vision to Event Cameras
Rebecq, H., Ranftl, R., Koltun, V., & Scaramuzza, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00398 · Cited by 420
Gallego, G., Rebecq, H., & Scaramuzza, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00407 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Bardow, P., Davison, A. J., & Leutenegger, S.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 884-892
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2472115300
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.