The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Staple: Complementary Learners for Real-Time Tracking
Open accessAbstract
Correlation Filter-based trackers have recently achieved excellent performance, showing great robustness to challenging situations exhibiting motion blur and illumination changes. However, since the model that they learn depends strongly on the spatial layout of the tracked object, they are notoriously sensitive to deformation. Models based on colour statistics have complementary traits: they cope well with variation in shape, but suffer when illumination is not consistent throughout a sequence. Moreover, colour distributions alone can be insufficiently discriminative. In this paper, we show that a simple tracker combining complementary cues in a ridge regression framework can operate faster than 80 FPS and outperform not only all entries in the popular VOT14 competition, but also recent and far more sophisticated trackers according to multiple benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
High-Speed Tracking with Kernelized Correlation Filters
Henriques, J. F., Caseiro, R., Martins, P., & Batista, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2345390 · Cited by 5,753
Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.312 · Cited by 4,138
Visual object tracking using adaptive correlation filters
Bolme, D., Beveridge, J. R., Draper, B. A., & Lui, Y. M. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539960 · Cited by 3,406
Robust object tracking with online multiple instance learning
Babenko, B., Yang, M.-H., & Belongie, S. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.226 · Cited by 2,007
Learning to Localize Objects with Structured Output Regression
Blaschko, M. B., & Lampert, C. H. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_2 · Cited by 324
Cited by
Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Tracking
Bertinetto, L., Valmadre, J., Henriques, J. F., Vedaldi, A., & Torr, P. H. S. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48881-3_56 · Cited by 4,546
Self-citationHigh Performance Visual Tracking with Siamese Region Proposal Network
Li, B., Yan, J., Wu, W., Zhu, Z., & Hu, X. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00935 · Cited by 3,023
ECO: Efficient Convolution Operators for Tracking
Danelljan, M., Bhat, G., Khan, F. S., & Felsberg, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.733 · Cited by 2,805
Beyond Correlation Filters: Learning Continuous Convolution Operators for Visual Tracking
Danelljan, M., Robinson, A., Shahbaz Khan, F., & Felsberg, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46454-1_29 · Cited by 1,853
GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wild
Huang, L., Zhao, X., & Huang, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2957464 · Cited by 1,809
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertinetto, L., Valmadre, J., Golodetz, S., Miksik, O., & Torr, P. H. S.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 1401-1409
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2188226927
- Cited by
- 1,776
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 84.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
