The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast Temporal Activity Proposals for Efficient Detection of Human Actions in Untrimmed Videos
Abstract
In many large-scale video analysis scenarios, one is interested in localizing and recognizing human activities that occur in short temporal intervals within long untrimmed videos. Current approaches for activity detection still struggle to handle large-scale video collections and the task remains relatively unexplored. This is in part due to the computational complexity of current action recognition approaches and the lack of a method that proposes fewer intervals in the video, where activity processing can be focused. In this paper, we introduce a proposal method that aims to recover temporal segments containing actions in untrimmed videos. Building on techniques for learning sparse dictionaries, we introduce a learning framework to represent and retrieve activity proposals. We demonstrate the capabilities of our method in not only producing high quality proposals but also in its efficiency. Finally, we show the positive impact our method has on recognition performance when it is used for action detection, while running at 10FPS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Action Recognition with Improved Trajectories
Wang, H., & Schmid, C. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.441 · Cited by 3,407
ActivityNet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding
Heilbron, F. C., Escorcia, V., Ghanem, B., & Niebles, J. C. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298698 · Cited by 2,578
Self-citationImage Classification with the Fisher Vector: Theory and Practice
Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F., Mensink, T., & Verbeek, J. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0636-x · Cited by 1,498
What Makes for Effective Detection Proposals?
Hosang, J., Benenson, R., Dollar, P., & Schiele, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2465908 · Cited by 727
Cited by
Temporal Action Detection with Structured Segment Networks
Zhao, Y., Xiong, Y., Wang, L., Wu, Z., Tang, X., & Lin, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.317 · Cited by 892
BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generation
Lin, T., Liu, X., Li, X., Ding, E., & Wen, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00399 · Cited by 694
TURN TAP: Temporal Unit Regression Network for Temporal Action Proposals
Gao, J., Yang, Z., Sun, C., Chen, K., & Nevatia, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.392 · Cited by 498
Gaussian Temporal Awareness Networks for Action Localization
Long, F., Yao, T., Qiu, Z., Tian, X., Luo, J., & Mei, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00043 · Cited by 380
Illuminating the dark spaces of healthcare with ambient intelligence
Haque, A., Milstein, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2669-y · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Heilbron, F. C., Niebles, J. C., & Ghanem, B.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 1914-1923
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2471143248
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
