Temporal Multimodal Learning in Audiovisual Speech Recognition
Open accessAbstract
In view of the advantages of deep networks in producing useful representation, the generated features of different modality data (such as image, audio) can be jointly learned using Multimodal Restricted Boltzmann Machines (MRB-M). Recently, audiovisual speech recognition based the M-RBM has attracted much attention, and the MRBM shows its effectiveness in learning the joint representation across audiovisual modalities. However, the built networks have weakness in modeling the multimodal sequence which is the natural property of speech signal. In this paper, we will introduce a novel temporal multimodal deep learning architecture, named as Recurrent Temporal Multimodal RB-M (RTMRBM), that models multimodal sequences by transforming the sequence of connected MRBMs into a probabilistic series model. Compared with existing multimodal networks, it's simple and efficient in learning temporal joint representation. We evaluate our model on audiovisual speech datasets, two public (AVLetters and AVLetters2) and one self-build. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach can obviously improve the accuracy of recognition compared with standard MRBM and the temporal model based on conditional RBM. In addition, RTMRBM still outperforms non-temporal multimodal deep networks in the presence of the weakness of long-term dependencies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the MRBM model, similar to the standard RBM, Contrastive Divergence (CD) [8, 23] or Persistent CD (PCD) [26] is used to approximate the gradient to maximize the joint likelihood, i.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
End-to-End Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Neural Networks
Tzirakis, P., Trigeorgis, G., Nicolaou, M. A., Schuller, B., & Zafeiriou, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.08619 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hu, D., Li, X., & Lu, X.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 3574-3582
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2474638510
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ir.opt.ac.cn
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Xi'an Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Xian Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- audio-visual speech recognition, joint representation learning, long-range dependencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review