Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,152

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks

Ilg, Eddy, Mayer, Nikolaus, Saikia, Tonmoy, Keuper, Margret, Dosovitskiy, Alexey, Brox, Thomas·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

The FlowNet demonstrated that optical flow estimation can be cast as a learning problem. However, the state of the art with regard to the quality of the flow has still been defined by traditional methods. Particularly on small displacements and real-world data, FlowNet cannot compete with variational methods. In this paper, we advance the concept of end-to-end learning of optical flow and make it work really well. The large improvements in quality and speed are caused by three major contributions: first, we focus on the training data and show that the schedule of presenting data during training is very important. Second, we develop a stacked architecture that includes warping of the second image with intermediate optical flow. Third, we elaborate on small displacements by introducing a subnetwork specializing on small motions. FlowNet 2.0 is only marginally slower than the original FlowNet but decreases the estimation error by more than 50%. It performs on par with state-of-the-art methods, while running at interactive frame rates. Moreover, we present faster variants that allow optical flow computation at up to 140fps with accuracy matching the original FlowNet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.179

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298607 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/ICCV.2013.175 · DOI · Paper page
  4. tran, 2016, Deep end2end voxe12voxel prediction (the 3rd workshop on deep learning in computer vision), IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  5. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.459 · DOI
  6. güney, 2016, Deep discrete flow, Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV)
  7. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.374 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_29 · DOI · Paper page
  9. lucas, 1981, An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision, Proceedings of the 7th Int Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI)
  10. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.438 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.242 · DOI · Paper page
  12. teney, 2016, Learning to extract motion from videos in convolutional neural networks
  13. bao, 2014, Fast edge-preserving patch-match for large displacement optical flow, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-15555-0_21 · DOI · Paper page
  15. bailer, 2016, CNN based patch matching for optical flow with thresholded hinge loss
  16. brox, 2004, High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)
  17. thewlis, 2016, Fully-trainable deep matching, British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC)
  18. 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.143 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.457 · DOI · Paper page
  20. chen, 2016, Trainable nonlinear reaction diffusion: A flexible framework for fast and effective image restoration, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI), 1
  21. 10.1109/ICIP.2016.7532634 · DOI
  22. ranjan, 2016, Optical flow estimation using a spatial pyramid network
  23. 10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_19 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298720 · DOI · Paper page
  25. simonyan, 2014, Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos, Conf on Neural Information Process ins Systems (NIPS)
  26. savva, 2015, Semantically-Enriched 3D Models for Common-sense Knowledge (Workshop on Functionality, Physics, Intentionality and Causality), IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  27. sundaram, 2010, Dense point trajectories by gpu-accelerated large displacement optical flow, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)
  28. soomro, 2013, Ucf101 A Dataset of 101 Human Actions Classes from Videos in the Wild

Cited by

See all 3,152

Metadata

Authors
Ilg, E., Mayer, N., Saikia, T., Keuper, M., Dosovitskiy, A., & Brox, T.
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
1647-1655
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560474170
Cited by
3,152
References
5
FWCI
94.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2017.179
The paper
Ilg, E., Mayer, N., Saikia, T., Keuper, M., Dosovitskiy, A., & Brox, T. (2017). FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.179

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.