Cited by 2,173Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Robust physical-world attacks on deep learning visual classification

Eykholt, Kevin, Evtimov, Ivan, Fernandes, Earlence, Li, Bo, Rahmati, Amir, Xiao, Chaowei, Prakash, Atul, Kohno, Tadayoshi +1 more·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Recent studies show that the state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, resulting from small-magnitude perturbations added to the input. Given that that emerging physical systems are using DNNs in safety-critical situations, adversarial examples could mislead these systems and cause dangerous situations. Therefore, understanding adversarial examples in the physical world is an important step towards developing resilient learning algorithms. We propose a general attack algorithm, Robust Physical Perturbations (RP2), to generate robust visual adversarial perturbations under different physical conditions. Using the real-world case of road sign classification, we show that adversarial examples generated using RP2 achieve high targeted misclassification rates against standard-architecture road sign classifiers in the physical world under various environmental conditions, including viewpoints. Due to the current lack of a standardized testing method, we propose a two-stage evaluation methodology for robust physical adversarial examples consisting of lab and field tests. Using this methodology, we evaluate the efficacy of physical adversarial manipulations on real objects. With a perturbation in the form of only black and white stickers, we attack a real stop sign, causing targeted misclassification in 100% of the images obtained in lab settings, and in 84.8% of the captured video frames obtained on a moving vehicle (field test) for the targ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00175

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lifecycle of the development of a typical AI product can be partitioned into data preparation, algorithm design, development-deployment, and management.

    “As shown by the solid-lined boxes in Figure 2, the lifecycle of the development of a typical AI product can be partitioned into data preparation, algorithm design, development-deployment, and management [25].”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

  • External attacks threaten the safety of autonomous driving.

    “Poor model performance as well as external attacks [25, 16] both threaten its safety.”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Poor model performance threatens the safety of autonomous driving.

    “Poor model performance as well as external attacks [25, 16] both threaten its safety.”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 2,173

Authors
Eykholt, K., Evtimov, I., Fernandes, E., Li, B., Rahmati, A., Xiao, C., Prakash, A., Kohno, T., & Song, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
1625-1634
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798302089
Cited by
2,173
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 257 · 2024: 281 · 2023: 325 · 2022: 301 · 2021: 388 · 2020: 283 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
87.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
physical adversarial attacks, adversarial examples, deep neural network robustness, visual categorization, road sign classification, viewpoint robustness, safety-critical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review