Cited by 136Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsLow-power high-performance VLSI designAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

Two-Step Quantization for Low-bit Neural Networks

Wang, Peisong, Hu, Qinghao, Zhang, Yifan, Zhang, Chunjie, Liu, Yang, Cheng, Jian·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Every bit matters in the hardware design of quantized neural networks. However, extremely-low-bit representation usually causes large accuracy drop. Thus, how to train extremely-low-bit neural networks with high accuracy is of central importance. Most existing network quantization approaches learn transformations (low-bit weights) as well as encodings (low-bit activations) simultaneously. This tight coupling makes the optimization problem difficult, and thus prevents the network from learning optimal representations. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective Two-Step Quantization (TSQ) framework, by decomposing the network quantization problem into two steps: code learning and transformation function learning based on the learned codes. For the first step, we propose the sparse quantization method for code learning. The second step can be formulated as a non-linear least square regression problem with low-bit constraints, which can be solved efficiently in an iterative manner. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ILSVRC-12 datasets demonstrate that the proposed TSQ is effective and outperforms the state-of-the-art by a large margin. Especially, for 2-bit activation and ternary weight quantization of AlexNet, the accuracy of our TSQ drops only about 0.5 points compared with the full-precision counterpart, outperforming current state-of-the-art by more than 5 points.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00460

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mixed-precision quantization can address this by using different bit precision for each layer.

    “It is possible to address this with mixed-precision quantization [51,82,102,162,187,199,211,239,246,249,263,282,286].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Hu, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., & Cheng, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
4376-4384
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798742790
Cited by
136
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
neural network quantization, low-bit neural networks, learning to code, AlexNet, quantization accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review