The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ring Loss: Convex Feature Normalization for Face Recognition
Open accessAbstract
We motivate and present Ring loss, a simple and elegant feature normalization approach for deep networks designed to augment standard loss functions such as Softmax. We argue that deep feature normalization is an important aspect of supervised classification problems where we require the model to represent each class in a multi-class problem equally well. The direct approach to feature normalization through the hard normalization operation results in a non-convex formulation. Instead, Ring loss applies soft normalization, where it gradually learns to constrain the norm to the scaled unit circle while preserving convexity leading to more robust features. We apply Ring loss to large-scale face recognition problems and present results on LFW, the challenging protocols of IJB-A Janus, Janus CS3 (a superset of IJB-A Janus), Celebrity Frontal-Profile (CFP) and MegaFace with 1 million distractors. Ring loss outperforms strong baselines, matches state-of-the-art performance on IJB-A Janus and outperforms all other results on the challenging Janus CS3 thereby achieving state-of-the-art. We also outperform strong baselines in handling extremely low resolution face matching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 · Cited by 15,267
A Discriminative Feature Learning Approach for Deep Face Recognition
Wen, Y., Zhang, K., Li, Z., & Qiao, Y. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_31 · Cited by 4,077
Cited by
Past, Present, and Future of Face Recognition: A Review
Adjabi, I., Ouahabi, A., Benzaoui, A., & Taleb-Ahmed, A. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9081188 · Cited by 560
Larger Norm More Transferable: An Adaptive Feature Norm Approach for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Xu, R., Li, G., Yang, J., & Lin, L. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00151 · Cited by 508
A survey on deep learning based face recognition
Guo, G., & Zhang, N. (2019) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2019.102805 · Cited by 485
Deep metric learning for few-shot image classification: A Review of recent developments
Li, X., Yang, X., Ma, Z., & Xue, J.-H. (2023) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109381 · Cited by 243
Improving the Intra-class Long-Tail in 3D Detection via Rare Example Mining
Jiang, C. M., Najibi, M., Qi, C. R., Zhou, Y., & Anguelov, D. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20080-9_10 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, Y., Pal, D. K., & Savvides, M.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 5089-5097
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2962922273
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.