Temporal Deformable Residual Networks for Action Segmentation in Videos
Abstract
This paper is about temporal segmentation of human actions in videos. We introduce a new model - temporal deformable residual network (TDRN) - aimed at analyzing video intervals at multiple temporal scales for labeling video frames. Our TDRN computes two parallel temporal streams: i) Residual stream that analyzes video information at its full temporal resolution, and ii) Pooling/unpooling stream that captures long-range video information at different scales. The former facilitates local, fine-scale action segmentation, and the latter uses multiscale context for improving accuracy of frame classification. These two streams are computed by a set of temporal residual modules with deformable convolutions, and fused by temporal residuals at the full video resolution. Our evaluation on the University of Dundee 50 Salads, Georgia Tech Egocentric Activities, and JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set demonstrates that TDRN outperforms the state of the art in frame-wise segmentation accuracy, segmental edit score, and segmental overlap F1 score.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both approaches in [15, 17] operate on downsampled videos with a temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second.
“Both approaches in [15, 17] operate on downsampled videos with a temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second.”
From MS-TCN++: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentation (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Previous temporal models operate on a low temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second.
“Previous temporal models operate on a low temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second [15, 17, 5].”
From MS-TCN++: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentation (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art results on 50Salads, GTEA, and the Breakfast dataset.
“Our model achieves state-of-the-art results on three challenging datasets: 50Salads, Georgia Tech Egocentric Activities (GTEA), and the Breakfast dataset.”
From MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentation (2019) · cites this paper as [8]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 202
- Authors
- Lei, P., & Todorovic, S.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- ORCID
- Lei, Peng
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 6742-6751
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799262584
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- action segmentation, video segmentation, deformable convolution, egocentric video, gesture recognition, human action recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review