Cited by 202Human Pose and Action RecognitionHand Gesture Recognition SystemsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Temporal Deformable Residual Networks for Action Segmentation in Videos

Lei, Peng, Todorovic, Sinisa·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

This paper is about temporal segmentation of human actions in videos. We introduce a new model - temporal deformable residual network (TDRN) - aimed at analyzing video intervals at multiple temporal scales for labeling video frames. Our TDRN computes two parallel temporal streams: i) Residual stream that analyzes video information at its full temporal resolution, and ii) Pooling/unpooling stream that captures long-range video information at different scales. The former facilitates local, fine-scale action segmentation, and the latter uses multiscale context for improving accuracy of frame classification. These two streams are computed by a set of temporal residual modules with deformable convolutions, and fused by temporal residuals at the full video resolution. Our evaluation on the University of Dundee 50 Salads, Georgia Tech Egocentric Activities, and JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set demonstrates that TDRN outperforms the state of the art in frame-wise segmentation accuracy, segmental edit score, and segmental overlap F1 score.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00705

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both approaches in [15, 17] operate on downsampled videos with a temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second.

    “Both approaches in [15, 17] operate on downsampled videos with a temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second.”
  • Previous temporal models operate on a low temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second.

    “Previous temporal models operate on a low temporal resolution of 1-3 frames per second [15, 17, 5].”
  • The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art results on 50Salads, GTEA, and the Breakfast dataset.

    “Our model achieves state-of-the-art results on three challenging datasets: 50Salads, Georgia Tech Egocentric Activities (GTEA), and the Breakfast dataset.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 202

Authors
Lei, P., & Todorovic, S.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
6742-6751
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799262584
Cited by
202
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
action segmentation, video segmentation, deformable convolution, egocentric video, gesture recognition, human action recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review