Cited by 27Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Activity Driven Weakly Supervised Object Detection

Open access
Yang, Zhenheng, Mahajan, Dhruv, Ghadiyaram, Deepti, Nevatia, Ram, Ramanathan, Vignesh·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Weakly supervised object detection aims at reducing the amount of supervision required to train detection models. Such models are traditionally learned from images/videos labelled only with the object class and not the object bounding box. In our work, we try to leverage not only the object class labels but also the action labels associated with the data. We show that the action depicted in the image/video can provide strong cues about the location of the associated object. We learn a spatial prior for the object dependent on the action (e.g. "ball" is closer to "leg of the person" in "kicking ball"), and incorporate this prior to simultaneously train a joint object detection and action classification model. We conducted experiments on both video datasets and image datasets to evaluate the performance of our weakly supervised object detection model. Our approach outperformed the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) method by more than 6% in mAP on the Charades video dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00303

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning-based approaches show great advantages in surface defect detection and other industrial applications.

    “deep learning-based approaches show great advantages in both surface defects detection and other industrial applications, such as the automotive industry [2], fruit classification [3], and object detection [4,5].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 27

Authors
Yang, Z., Mahajan, D., Ghadiyaram, D., Nevatia, R., & Ramanathan, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
2912-2921
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954345245
Cited by
27
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
weakly supervised object detection, activity recognition, spatial priors, charades, bounding box localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review