The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Semantic Segmentation via Video Propagation and Label Relaxation
Open accessAbstract
Semantic segmentation requires large amounts of pixel-wise annotations to learn accurate models. In this paper, we present a video prediction-based methodology to scale up training sets by synthesizing new training samples in order to improve the accuracy of semantic segmentation networks. We exploit video prediction models' ability to predict future frames in order to also predict future labels. A joint propagation strategy is also proposed to alleviate mis-alignments in synthesized samples. We demonstrate that training segmentation models on datasets augmented by the synthesized samples leads to significant improvements in accuracy. Furthermore, we introduce a novel boundary label relaxation technique that makes training robust to annotation noise and propagation artifacts along object boundaries. Our proposed methods achieve state-of-the-art mIoUs of 83.5% on Cityscapes and 82.9% on CamVid. Our single model, without model ensembles, achieves 72.8% mIoU on the KITTI semantic segmentation test set, which surpasses the winning entry of the ROB challenge 2018.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.00915 · Cited by 22,392
Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation
Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 · Cited by 20,054
Self-citationSegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 · Cited by 19,631
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433
Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions
Yu, F., & Koltun, V. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.07122 · Cited by 7,738
BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation
Yu, C., Wang, J., Peng, C., Gao, C., Yu, G., & Sang, N. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_20 · Cited by 2,968
Ros, G., Sellart, L., Materzynska, J., Vazquez, D., & Lopez, A. M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.352 · Cited by 2,338
The Mapillary Vistas Dataset for Semantic Understanding of Street Scenes
Neuhold, G., Ollmann, T., Bulo, S. R., & Kontschieder, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.534 · Cited by 1,434
Segmentation and Recognition Using Structure from Motion Point Clouds
Brostow, G. J., Shotton, J., Fauqueur, J., & Cipolla, R. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_5 · Cited by 1,050
Cited by
ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networks
Zhang, H., Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Zhu, Y., Lin, H., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., He, T., Mueller, J., Manmatha, R., et al. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00309 · Cited by 1,648
Self-citationObject-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentation
Yuan, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_11 · Cited by 1,285
PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection
Vora, S., Lang, A. H., Helou, B., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00466 · Cited by 1,236
Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic Segmentation
Wang, H., Zhu, Y., Green, B., Adam, H., Yuille, A., & Chen, L.-C. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58548-8_7 · Cited by 809
Self-citationPanoptic-DeepLab: A Simple, Strong, and Fast Baseline for Bottom-Up Panoptic Segmentation
Cheng, B., Collins, M. D., Zhu, Y., Liu, T., Huang, T. S., Adam, H., & Chen, L.-C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01249 · Cited by 635
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Sapra, K., Reda, F. A., Shih, K. J., Newsam, S., Tao, A., & Catanzaro, B.
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-06
- Pages
- 8848-8857
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964254867
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 22.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
