Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Defocus Map Estimation Using Domain Adaptation

Lee, Junyong, Lee, Sungkil, Cho, Sunghyun, Lee, Seungyong·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, Defocus Map Estimation Network (DMENet), for spatially varying defocus map estimation. To train the network, we produce a novel depth-of-field (DOF) dataset, SYNDOF, where each image is synthetically blurred with a ground-truth depth map. Due to the synthetic nature of SYNDOF, the feature characteristics of images in SYNDOF can differ from those of real defocused photos. To address this gap, we use domain adaptation that transfers the features of real defocused photos into those of synthetically blurred ones. Our DMENet consists of four subnetworks: blur estimation, domain adaptation, content preservation, and sharpness calibration networks. The subnetworks are connected to each other and jointly trained with their corresponding supervisions in an end-to-end manner. Our method is evaluated on publicly available blur detection and blur estimation datasets and the results show the state-of-the-art performance.In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, Defocus Map Estimation Network (DMENet), for spatially varying defocus map estimation. To train the network, we produce a novel depth-of-field (DOF) dataset, SYNDOF, where each image is synthetically blurred with a ground-truth depth map. Due to the synthetic nature of SYNDOF, the feature characteristics of images in SYNDOF can differ from those of real defocused photos. To address this gap, we use domain adaptation that transfers the features of real defocused photos into those of synthetically blurred ones. Our DMENet consists of four subnetworks: blur estimation, domain adaptation, content preservation, and sharpness calibration networks. The subnetworks are connected to each other and jointly trained with their corresponding supervisions in an end-to-end manner. Our method is evaluated on publicly available blur detection and blur estimation datasets and the results show the state-of-the-art performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.01250

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J., Lee, S., Cho, S., & Lee, S.
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
12214-12222
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969717429
Cited by
160
References
6
FWCI
24.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Defocus Map Estimation Using Domain Adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2019.01250
The paper
Lee, J., Lee, S., Cho, S., & Lee, S. (2019). Deep Defocus Map Estimation Using Domain Adaptation. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2019.01250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.