From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Quality
Open accessAbstract
Blind or no-reference (NR) perceptual picture quality prediction is a difficult, unsolved problem of great consequence to the social and streaming media industries that impacts billions of viewers daily. Unfortunately, popular NR prediction models perform poorly on real-world distorted pictures. To advance progress on this problem, we introduce the largest (by far) subjective picture quality database, containing about 40, 000 real-world distorted pictures and 120, 000 patches, on which we collected about 4M human judgments of picture quality. Using these picture and patch quality labels, we built deep region-based architectures that learn to produce state-of-the-art global picture quality predictions as well as useful local picture quality maps. Our innovations include picture quality prediction architectures that produce global-to-local inferences as well as local-to-global inferences (via feedback). The dataset and source code are available at https: //live.ece.utexas.edu/research.php.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most probable reason for PaQ-2-PiQ and KonCept512's poor performance is that they were trained on picture quality datasets which contain different types of (strictly spatial) distortions than UGC-VQA databases.
“The most probable reason would be that these models were trained on picture quality datasets [64], [70], which contain different types of (strictly spatial) distortions than UGC-VQA databases.”
From UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2021) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 406
- Authors
- Ying, Z., Niu, H., Gupta, P., Mahajan, D., Ghadiyaram, D., & Bovik, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 3572-3582
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035712445
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- no-reference image quality assessment, perceptual image quality, subjective quality database, image patches, quality map
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review