Cited by 166Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesMachine Learning and Data ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Augment your batch: Improving generalization through instance repetition

Open access
Hoffer, Elad, Ben-Nun, Tal, Hubara, Itay, Giladi, Niv, Hoefler, Torsten, Soudry, Daniel·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Large-batch SGD is important for scaling training of deep neural networks. However, without fine-tuning hyperparameter schedules, the generalization of the model may be hampered. We propose to use batch augmentation: replicating instances of samples within the same batch with different data augmentations. Batch augmentation acts as a regularizer and an accelerator, increasing both generalization and performance scaling for a fixed budget of optimization steps. We analyze the effect of batch augmentation on gradient variance and show that it empirically improves convergence for a wide variety of networks and datasets. Our results show that batch augmentation reduces the number of necessary SGD updates to achieve the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art. Overall, this simple yet effective method enables faster training and better generalization by allowing more computational resources to be used concurrently.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00815

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated augmentation provides a significant boost in performance and is one of the key ingredients of the proposed training procedure.

    “We also use repeated augmentation [4, 25], which provides a significant boost in performance and is one of the key ingredients of our proposed training procedure.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 166

Authors
Hoffer, E., Ben-Nun, T., Hubara, I., Giladi, N., Hoefler, T., & Soudry, D.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
8126-8135
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035452548
Cited by
166
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
generalization, data augmentation, gradient variance, training acceleration, convergence, regularization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review