Augment your batch: Improving generalization through instance repetition
Open accessAbstract
Large-batch SGD is important for scaling training of deep neural networks. However, without fine-tuning hyperparameter schedules, the generalization of the model may be hampered. We propose to use batch augmentation: replicating instances of samples within the same batch with different data augmentations. Batch augmentation acts as a regularizer and an accelerator, increasing both generalization and performance scaling for a fixed budget of optimization steps. We analyze the effect of batch augmentation on gradient variance and show that it empirically improves convergence for a wide variety of networks and datasets. Our results show that batch augmentation reduces the number of necessary SGD updates to achieve the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art. Overall, this simple yet effective method enables faster training and better generalization by allowing more computational resources to be used concurrently.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repeated augmentation provides a significant boost in performance and is one of the key ingredients of the proposed training procedure.
“We also use repeated augmentation [4, 25], which provides a significant boost in performance and is one of the key ingredients of our proposed training procedure.”
From Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Hoffer, E., Ben-Nun, T., Hubara, I., Giladi, N., Hoefler, T., & Soudry, D.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 8126-8135
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035452548
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- generalization, data augmentation, gradient variance, training acceleration, convergence, regularization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review