Cited by 294Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Towards Visually Explaining Variational Autoencoders

Open access
Liu, Wenqian, Li, Runze, Zheng, Meng, Karanam, Srikrishna, Wu, Ziyan, Bhanu, Bir, Radke, Richard J., Camps, Octavia·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recent advances in Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model interpretability have led to impressive progress in visualizing and understanding model predictions. In particular, gradient-based visual attention methods have driven much recent effort in using visual attention maps as a means for visual explanations. A key problem, however, is these methods are designed for classification and categorization tasks, and their extension to explaining generative models, e.g., variational autoencoders (VAE) is not trivial. In this work, we take a step towards bridging this crucial gap, proposing the first technique to visually explain VAEs by means of gradient-based attention. We present methods to generate visual attention from the learned latent space, and also demonstrate such attention explanations serve more than just explaining VAE predictions. We show how these attention maps can be used to localize anomalies in images, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance on the MVTec-AD dataset. We also show how they can be infused into model training, helping bootstrap the VAE into learning improved latent space disentanglement, demonstrated on the Dsprites dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00867

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 294

Authors
Liu, W., Li, R., Zheng, M., Karanam, S., Wu, Z., Bhanu, B., Radke, R. J., & Camps, O.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
8639-8648
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034648032
Cited by
294
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 7
FWCI
15.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1638234, 1808381, 1911197)
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2013-ST-061-ED0001)
  • Science and Technology Directorate (2013-ST-061-ED0001)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
  • Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
variational autoencoder, visual explanations, visual attention maps, latent space, anomaly localization, MVTec AD, latent space disentanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review