Cited by 220Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Localization Distillation for Dense Object Detection

Open access
Zheng, Zhaohui, Ye, Rongguang, Wang, Ping, Ren, Dongwei, Zuo, Wangmeng, Hou, Qibin, Cheng, Ming-Ming·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Knowledge distillation (KD) has witnessed its powerful capability in learning compact models in object detection. Previous KD methods for object detection mostly focus on imitating deep features within the imitation regions instead of mimicking classification logit due to its inefficiency in distilling localization information and trivial improvement. In this paper, by reformulating the knowledge distillation process on localization, we present a novel localization distillation (LD) method which can efficiently transfer the localization knowledge from the teacher to the student. Moreover, we also heuristically introduce the concept of valuable localization region that can aid to selectively distill the semantic and localization knowledge for a certain region. Combining these two new components, for the first time, we show that logit mimicking can outperform feature imitation and localization knowledge distillation is more important and efficient than semantic knowledge for distilling object detectors. Our distillation scheme is simple as well as effective and can be easily applied to different dense object detectors. Experiments show that our LD can boost the AP score of GFocal-ResNet-50 with a single-scale 1 x training schedule from 40.1 to 42.1 on the COCO benchmark without any sacrifice on the inference speed. Our source code and pretrained models are publicly available at https://github.com/HikariTJU/LD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00919

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benefitting from GFLV1, each edge of a bounding box can be represented as a probability distribution through SoftMax function.

    “Benefitting from the general representation of distributions for bounding boxes from GFLV1 detector, each edge e of a bounding box can be represented as a probability distribution through SoftMax function [38].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Z., Ye, R., Wang, P., Ren, D., Zuo, W., Hou, Q., & Cheng, M.-M.
Affiliations
  • Nankai University (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
9397-9406
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313119505
Cited by
220
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 8
FWCI
15.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0100400)
  • NSFC (61922046,62172127)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
knowledge distillation, dense object detection, COCO benchmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review