Reinforced Structured State-Evolution for Vision-Language Navigation
Open accessAbstract
Vision-and-language Navigation (VLN) task requires an embodied agent to navigate to a remote location following a natural language instruction. Previous methods usually adopt a sequence model (e.g., Transformer and LSTM) as the navigator. In such a paradigm, the sequence model predicts action at each step through a maintained navigation state, which is generally represented as a one-dimensional vector. However, the crucial navigation clues (i.e., object-level environment layout) for embodied navigation task is discarded since the maintained vector is essentially unstructured. In this paper, we propose a novel Structured state-Evolution (SEvol) model to effectively maintain the environment layout clues for VLN. Specifically, we utilise the graph-based feature to represent the navigation state instead of the vector-based state. Accordingly, we devise a Reinforced Layout clues Miner (RLM) to mine and detect the most crucial layout graph for long-term navigation via a customised reinforcement learning strategy. Moreover, the Structured Evolving Module (SEM) is proposed to maintain the structured graph-based state during navigation, where the state is gradually evolved to learn the object-level spatial-temporal relationship. The experiments on the R2R and R4R datasets show that the proposed SEvol model improves VLN models' performance by large margins, e.g., +3% absolute SPL accuracy for NvEM and +8% for EnvDrop on the R2R test set.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large-scale pretrained models such as Qwen2-VL achieve high accuracy in inference-intensive tasks through vision-language alignment, supporting the importance of cross-modal alignment for 3D question answering.
“Notably, large-scale pretrained models such as Qwen2-VL [287] achieve high accuracy in inference-intensive tasks through vision-language alignment, further validating the importance of cross-modal alignment for 3D question answering (3D-QA).”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [287]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Chen, J., Gao, C., Meng, E., Zhang, Q., & Liu, S.
- Affiliations
- Beihang University (CN)
- Xiaomi (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 15429-15438
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312618696
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62122010,61876177)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- vision-and-language navigation, long-term navigation, embodied agents, natural language instructions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review