Cited by 45Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Reinforced Structured State-Evolution for Vision-Language Navigation

Open access
Chen, Jinyu, Gao, Chen, Meng, Erli, Zhang, Qiong, Liu, Si·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Vision-and-language Navigation (VLN) task requires an embodied agent to navigate to a remote location following a natural language instruction. Previous methods usually adopt a sequence model (e.g., Transformer and LSTM) as the navigator. In such a paradigm, the sequence model predicts action at each step through a maintained navigation state, which is generally represented as a one-dimensional vector. However, the crucial navigation clues (i.e., object-level environment layout) for embodied navigation task is discarded since the maintained vector is essentially unstructured. In this paper, we propose a novel Structured state-Evolution (SEvol) model to effectively maintain the environment layout clues for VLN. Specifically, we utilise the graph-based feature to represent the navigation state instead of the vector-based state. Accordingly, we devise a Reinforced Layout clues Miner (RLM) to mine and detect the most crucial layout graph for long-term navigation via a customised reinforcement learning strategy. Moreover, the Structured Evolving Module (SEM) is proposed to maintain the structured graph-based state during navigation, where the state is gradually evolved to learn the object-level spatial-temporal relationship. The experiments on the R2R and R4R datasets show that the proposed SEvol model improves VLN models' performance by large margins, e.g., +3% absolute SPL accuracy for NvEM and +8% for EnvDrop on the R2R test set.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01501

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale pretrained models such as Qwen2-VL achieve high accuracy in inference-intensive tasks through vision-language alignment, supporting the importance of cross-modal alignment for 3D question answering.

    “Notably, large-scale pretrained models such as Qwen2-VL [287] achieve high accuracy in inference-intensive tasks through vision-language alignment, further validating the importance of cross-modal alignment for 3D question answering (3D-QA).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 45

Authors
Chen, J., Gao, C., Meng, E., Zhang, Q., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • Xiaomi (China) (CN)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
15429-15438
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312618696
Cited by
45
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62122010,61876177)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, long-term navigation, embodied agents, natural language instructions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review