Coopernaut: End-to-End Driving with Cooperative Perception for Networked Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Optical sensors and learning algorithms for autonomous vehicles have dramatically advanced in the past few years. Nonetheless, the reliability of today's autonomous vehicles is hindered by the limited line-of-sight sensing capability and the brittleness of data-driven methods in handling extreme situations. With recent developments of telecommunication technologies, cooperative perception with vehicle-to-vehicle communications has become a promising paradigm to enhance autonomous driving in dangerous or emergency situations. We introduce Coopernaut,an end-to-end learning model that uses cross-vehicle perception for vision-based cooperative driving. Our model encodes Li-DAR information into compact point-based representations that can be transmitted as messages between vehicles via realistic wireless channels. To evaluate our model, we develop Autocastsim,a network-augmented driving simulation framework with example accident-prone scenarios. Our experiments on Autocastsim suggest that our cooperative perception driving models lead to a 40% improvement in average success rate over egocentric driving mod-els in these challenging driving situations and a$5\times$smaller bandwidth requirement than prior work V2VNet. Cooper-nautand Autocastsim are available at https://ut-austin-rpl.github.io/Coopernaut/.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The limitations of single-vehicle on-board sensors can be addressed through collaborative perception, which enhances accuracy and stability by utilizing shared perception data.
“The limitations of single-vehicle on-board sensors can be addressed through collaborative perception, which enhances accuracy and stability by utilizing shared perception data.”
From Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Survey and Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Cui, J., Qiu, H., Chen, D., Stone, P., & Zhu, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Sony (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 17231-17241
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309592030
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 29.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NSF (CNS-1955523,FRR-2145283,CPS-1739964,IIS-1724157,FAIN-2019844)
- ONR (N00014-18-2243)
- ARO (W911NF-19-2-0333)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- cooperative perception, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, autonomous driving, end-to-end driving models, wireless channel simulation, spectral efficiency, connected vehicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review