ScanQA: 3D Question Answering for Spatial Scene Understanding
Open accessAbstract
We propose a new 3D spatial understanding task for 3D question answering (3D-QA). In the 3D-QA task, models receive visual information from the entire 3D scene of a rich RGB-D indoor scan and answer given textual questions about the 3D scene. Unlike the 2D-question answering of visual question answering, the conventional 2D-QA models suffer from problems with spatial understanding of object alignment and directions and fail in object localization from the textual questions in 3D-QA. We propose a baseline model for 3D-QA, called the ScanQA11https://github.com/ATR-DBI/ScanQA, which learns a fused descriptor from 3D object proposals and encoded sentence embeddings. This learned descriptor correlates language expressions with the underlying geometric features of the 3D scan and facilitates the regression of 3D bounding boxes to determine the described objects in textual questions. We collected human-edited question-answer pairs with free-form answers grounded in 3D objects in each 3D scene. Our new ScanQA dataset contains over 41k question-answer pairs from 800 indoor scenes obtained from the ScanNet dataset. To the best of our knowledge, ScanQA is the first large-scale effort to perform object-grounded question answering in 3D environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Touch and Go collects paired visual and tactile data from real-world environments and explores cross-modal relationships using self-supervised learning.
“Touch and Go [245] collects paired visual and tactile data from real-world environments and explores cross-modal relationships using self-supervised learning methods.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [245]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 197
- Authors
- Azuma, D., Miyanishi, T., Kurita, S., & Kawanabe, M.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- RIKEN (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 19107-19117
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4226376247
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- NEDO (JPNP20006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- sentence embeddings, 3D bounding box regression, ScanNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review