Cited by 197Multimodal Machine Learning Applications3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

ScanQA: 3D Question Answering for Spatial Scene Understanding

Open access
Azuma, Daichi, Miyanishi, Taiki, Kurita, Shuhei, Kawanabe, Motoaki·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We propose a new 3D spatial understanding task for 3D question answering (3D-QA). In the 3D-QA task, models receive visual information from the entire 3D scene of a rich RGB-D indoor scan and answer given textual questions about the 3D scene. Unlike the 2D-question answering of visual question answering, the conventional 2D-QA models suffer from problems with spatial understanding of object alignment and directions and fail in object localization from the textual questions in 3D-QA. We propose a baseline model for 3D-QA, called the ScanQA11https://github.com/ATR-DBI/ScanQA, which learns a fused descriptor from 3D object proposals and encoded sentence embeddings. This learned descriptor correlates language expressions with the underlying geometric features of the 3D scan and facilitates the regression of 3D bounding boxes to determine the described objects in textual questions. We collected human-edited question-answer pairs with free-form answers grounded in 3D objects in each 3D scene. Our new ScanQA dataset contains over 41k question-answer pairs from 800 indoor scenes obtained from the ScanNet dataset. To the best of our knowledge, ScanQA is the first large-scale effort to perform object-grounded question answering in 3D environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01854

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Touch and Go collects paired visual and tactile data from real-world environments and explores cross-modal relationships using self-supervised learning.

    “Touch and Go [245] collects paired visual and tactile data from real-world environments and explores cross-modal relationships using self-supervised learning methods.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 197

Authors
Azuma, D., Miyanishi, T., Kurita, S., & Kawanabe, M.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
19107-19117
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226376247
Cited by
197
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3
FWCI
11.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
NEDO (JPNP20006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
sentence embeddings, 3D bounding box regression, ScanNet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review