Cited by 26Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and Learning

Meta-Explore: Exploratory Hierarchical Vision-and-Language Navigation Using Scene Object Spectrum Grounding

Hwang, Minyoung, Jeong, Jaeyeon, Kim, Minsoo, Oh, Yoonseon, Oh, Songhwai·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

The main challenge in vision-and-language navigation (VLN) is how to understand natural-language instructions in an unseen environment. The main limitation of conventional VLN algorithms is that if an action is mistaken, the agent fails to follow the instructions or explores unnecessary regions, leading the agent to an irrecoverable path. To tackle this problem, we propose Meta-Explore, a hierarchical navigation method deploying an exploitation policy to correct misled recent actions. We show that an exploitation policy, which moves the agent toward a well-chosen local goal among unvisited but observable states, outperforms a method which moves the agent to a previously visited state. We also highlight the demand for imagining regretful explorations with semantically meaningful clues. The key to our approach is understanding the object placements around the agent in spectral-domain. Specifically, we present a novel visual representation, called scene object spectrum (SOS), which performs category-wise 2D Fourier transform of detected objects. Combining exploitation policy and SOS features, the agent can correct its path by choosing a promising local goal. We evaluate our method in three VLN benchmarks: R2R, SOON, and REVERIE. Meta-Explore outper-forms other baselines and shows significant generalization performance. In addition, local goal search using the proposed spectral-domain SOS features significantly improves the success rate by 17.1% and SPL by 20. 6% against the state-of-the-art method of the SOON benchmark. Project page: https://rllab-snu.github.io/projects/Meta-Explore/doc.html

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00646

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CALVIN, based on PyBullet, includes 34 tasks and emphasizes long-horizon planning and multi-task adaptability.

    “CALVIN [293], based on PyBullet, includes 34 tasks and emphasizes long-horizon planning and multi-task adaptability.”
  • PyBullet powers CALVIN and Ravens, but its physics accuracy is lower than Isaac Sim and MuJoCo, especially in complex multi-body interactions.

    “It powers benchmarks such as CALVIN [293] and Ravens, but its physics accuracy is lower than that of Isaac Sim and MuJoCo, particularly in complex multi-body interactions.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 26

Authors
Hwang, M., Jeong, J., Kim, M., Oh, Y., & Oh, S.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
6683-6693
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386065347
Cited by
26
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12
FWCI
4.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, hierarchical navigation, natural language instructions, unknown environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review