DF-Platter: Multi-Face Heterogeneous Deepfake Dataset
Abstract
Deepfake detection is gaining significant importance in the research community. While most of the research efforts are focused towards high-quality images and videos with controlled appearance of individuals, deepfake generation algorithms now have the capability to generate deep-fakes with low-resolution, occlusion, and manipulation of multiple subjects. In this research, we emulate the real-world scenario of deepfake generation and propose the DF-Platter dataset, which contains (i) both low-resolution and high-resolution deepfakes generated using multiple generation techniques and (ii) single-subject and multiple-subject deepfakes, with face images of Indian ethnicity. Faces in the dataset are annotated for various attributes such as gender, age, skin tone, and occlusion. The dataset is prepared in 116 days with continuous usage of 32 GPUs accounting to 1,800 GB cumulative memory. With over 500 GBs in size, the dataset contains a total of 133,260 videos encompassing three sets. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest datasets containing vast variability and multiple challenges. We also provide benchmark results under multiple evaluation settings using popular and state-of-the-art deepfake detection models, for c0 images and videos along with c23 and c40 compression variants. The results demonstrate a significant performance reduction in the deepfake detection task on low-resolution deep-fakes. Furthermore, existing techniques yield declined detection accura…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only a few datasets like OpenForensics, DF-Platter, and DeeShy attempt to involve challenging scenarios such as multiple fake faces in an image or video, low-quality deepfakes, or face occlusion.
“Only a few datasets like OpenForensics [31], DF-Platter [44], and DeeShy [43] attempt to involve challenging scenarios such as multiple fake faces in an image or video, low-quality DFs, or face occlusion.”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
These datasets specifically address the increasingly common scenario where multiple subjects within a single frame/image have been manipulated.
“These datasets specifically address the increasingly common scenario where multiple subjects within a single frame/image have been manipulated”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
Researchers evaluate their detection methods on specialized datasets designed for multi-subject forgery detection, including OpenForensics and DF-Platter.
“Researchers evaluate their detection methods on specialized datasets designed for multi-subject forgery detection, including OpenForensics [31] and DF-Platter [44].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
The size of the DFD benchmark datasets further increased to over 100,000 videos in each dataset including DF-Platter in 2023.
“The size of the DFD benchmark datasets further increased to over 100,000 videos in each dataset including DF-Platter in 2023 [8,9].”
From A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Narayan, K., Agarwal, H., Thakral, K., Mittal, S., Vatsa, M., & Singh, R.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN)
- IIT Jodhpur,India
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-06
- Pages
- 9739-9748
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386076380
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, deepfake datasets, occlusion, benchmark evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review