Cited by 37Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsNatural Language Processing Techniques

You Need Multiple Exiting: Dynamic Early Exiting for Accelerating Unified Vision Language Model

Open access
Tang, Shengkun, Wang, Yaqing, Kong, Zhenglun, Zhang, Tianchi, Li, Yao, Ding, Caiwen, Wang, Yanzhi, Liang, Yi +1 more·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Large-scale Transformer models bring significant improvements for various downstream vision language tasks with a unified architecture. The performance improvements come with increasing model size, resulting in slow inference speed and increased cost for severing. While some certain predictions benefit from the full computation of the large-scale model, not all of inputs need the same amount of computation to conduct, potentially leading to computation resource waste. To handle this challenge, early exiting is proposed to adaptively allocate computational power in term of input complexity to improve inference efficiency. The existing early exiting strategies usually adopt output confidence based on intermediate layers as a proxy of input complexity to incur the decision of skipping following layers. However, such strategies cannot be applied to encoder in the widely-used unified architecture with both encoder and decoder due to difficulty of output confidence estimation in the encoder layers. It is suboptimal in term of saving computation power to ignore the early exiting in encoder component. To address this issue, we propose a novel early exiting strategy for unified vision language models, which allows to dynamically skip the layers in encoder and decoder simultaneously in term of input layer-wise similarities with multiple times of early exiting, namely MuE. By decomposing the image and text modalities in the encoder, MuE is flexible and can skip different layers in term of modalities, advancing the inference efficiency while minimizing performance drop. Experiments on the SNLI-VE and MS COCO datasets show that the proposed approach MuE can reduce expected inference time by up to 50% and 40% while maintaining 99% and 96% performance respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01038

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work demonstrated that layers in pretrained models can be skipped without significant performance degradation.

    “Prior work (Shukor and Cord, 2024; Tang et al., 2023) demonstrated the possibility of skipping layers in pretrained models without incurring in significant performance degradation.”

    From SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics (2025) · cites this paper as Tang et al., 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, S., Wang, Y., Kong, Z., Zhang, T., Li, Y., Ding, C., Wang, Y., Liang, Y., & Xu, D.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
10781-10791
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386065753
Cited by
37
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
early exit, inference acceleration, computational efficiency, encoder-decoder architecture, input complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review