Cited by 154Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Lite DETR : An Interleaved Multi-Scale Encoder for Efficient DETR

Open access
Li, Feng, Zeng, Ailing, Liu, Shilong, Zhang, Hao, Li, Hongyang, Zhang, Lei, Ni, Lionel M.·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recent DEtection TRansformer-based (DETR) models have obtained remarkable performance. Its success cannot be achieved without the re-introduction of multi-scale feature fusion in the encoder. However, the excessively increased tokens in multi-scale features, especially for about 75% of low-level features, are quite computationally inefficient, which hinders real applications of DETR models. In this paper, we present Lite DETR, a simple yet efficient end-to-end object detection framework that can effectively reduce the GFLOPs of the detection head by 60% while keeping 99% of the original performance. Specifically, we design an efficient encoder block to update high-level features (corresponding to small-resolution feature maps) and low-level features (corresponding to large-resolution feature maps) in an interleaved way. In addition, to better fuse cross-scale features, we develop a key-aware deformable attention to predict more reliable attention weights. Comprehensive experiments validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed Lite DETR, and the efficient encoder strategy can generalize well across existing DETR-based models. The code will be available in https://github.com/IDEA-Research/Lite-DETR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01780

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DAB-DETR and DN-DETR improve performance by introducing the iterative refinement scheme and denoising training.

    “DAB-DETR [23] and DN-DETR [17] further improve performance by introducing the iterative refinement scheme and denoising training.”

    From DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, F., Zeng, A., Liu, S., Zhang, H., Li, H., Zhang, L., & Ni, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • International Digital Economy Academy (IDEA)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
18558-18567
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386076079
Cited by
154
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 11
FWCI
16.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
DETR, object detection, multi-scale feature fusion, computational efficiency, low-level features, high-level features, cross-scale feature fusion, attention weights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review