Cited by 1443D Shape Modeling and AnalysisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

ULIP-2: Towards Scalable Multimodal Pre-Training for 3D Understanding

Open access
Xue, Le, Yu, Ning, Zhang, Shu, Panagopoulou, Artemis, Li, Junnan, Martín-Martín, Roberto, Wu, Jiajun, Xiong, Caiming +3 more·2024·2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recent advancements in multimodal pretraining have shown promising efficacy in 3D representation learning by aligning multimodal features across 3D shapes, their 2D counterparts, and language descriptions. However, the methods used by existing frameworks to curate such multimodal data, in particular language descriptions for 3D shapes, are not scalable, and the collected language descriptions are not diverse. To address this, we introduce ULIP-2, a simple yet effective tri-modal pretraining framework that leverages large multimodal models to automatically generate holistic language descriptions for 3D shapes. It only needs 3D data as input, eliminating the need for any manual 3D annotations, and is therefore scalable to large datasets. ULIP-2 is also equipped with scaled-up backbones for better multimodal representation learning. We conduct experiments on two large-scale 3D datasets, Objaverse and ShapeNet, and augment them with tri-modal datasets of 3D point clouds, images, and language for training ULIP-2. Experiments show that ULIP-2 demonstrates substantial benefits in three downstream tasks: zero-shot 3D classification, standard 3D classification with fine-tuning, and 3D captioning (3D-to-language generation). It achieves a new SOTA of 50.6% (top-1) on Objaverse-LVIS and 84.7% (top-1) on ModelNet40 in zero-shot classification. In the ScanObjectNN benchmark for standard fine-tuning, ULIP-2 reaches an overall accuracy of 91.5% with a compact model of only 1.4 million parameters. ULIP-2 sheds light on a new paradigm for scalable multimodal 3D representation learning without human annotations and shows significant improvements over existing baselines. The code and datasets are released at https://github.com/salesforce/ULIP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02558

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 144

Authors
Xue, L., Yu, N., Zhang, S., Panagopoulou, A., Li, J., Martín-Martín, R., Wu, J., Xiong, C., Xu, R., Niebles, J. C., & Savarese, S.
Affiliations
  • Salesforce (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-06-16
Pages
27081-27091
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402727761
Cited by
144
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 5
FWCI
38.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multimodal pre-training, 3D representation learning, 3D objects, large multimodal models, point clouds, Objaverse, ShapeNet, ScanObjectNN

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review