The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-Based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Open accessAbstract
Recently, the proliferation of highly realistic synthetic images, facilitated through a variety of GANs and Diffusions, has significantly heightened the susceptibility to misuse. While the primary focus of deepfake detection has traditionally centered on the design of detection algorithms, an investigative inquiry into the generator architectures has remained conspicuously absent in recent years. This paper contributes to this lacuna by rethinking the architectures of CNN-based generator, thereby establishing a generalized representation of synthetic artifacts. Our findings illuminate that the up-sampling operator can, beyond frequency-based artifacts, produce generalized forgery artifacts. In particular, the local interdependence among image pixels caused by upsampling operators is significantly demon-strated in synthetic images generated by GAN or diffusion. Building upon this observation, we introduce the concept of Neighboring Pixel Relationships(NPR) as a means to capture and characterize the generalized structural artifacts stemming from up-sampling operations. A comprehensive analysis is conducted on an open-world dataset, comprising samples generated by 28 distinct generative models. This analysis culminates in the establishment of a novel state-of-the-art performance, showcasing a remarkable 12.8% im-provement over existing methods. The code is available at https://github.com/chuangchuangtan/NPR-DeepfakeDetection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The frequency spectrum of GAN-generated images often contains distinctive patterns - 'checkerboards', particularly in the middle and high-frequency bands.
“Several studies have shown that the frequency spectrum of GAN-generated images often contains distinctive patterns - 'checkerboards', particularly in the middle and high-frequency bands [85-89].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [89]
Section 2.2 describes frequency-spectrum representations of GAN up-sampling artifacts, and Section 3.3 notes diverse frequency-domain patterns in GAN images. Neither passage identifies those patterns as checkerboards or locates them particularly in the middle and high-frequency bands; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 225
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- Bellemare, 2017, The cramer distance as a solution to biased wasserstein gradients
- Berthelot, 2017, Began: Boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks
- Brock, 2018, ICLR
- Cao, 2022, CVPR, 4113
- Chai, 2020, ECCV, 103
- Chen, 2022, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- Chen, 2022, CVPR, 18710
- Choi, 2018, CVPR, 8789
- Chuangchuang, 2024, Gangen-detection: A dataset generated by gans for gener-alizable deepfake detection.
- Dhariwal, 2021, Advances in neural information processing systems, 34, 8780
- Durall, 2020, CVPR, 7890
- Frank, 2020, ICML, 3247
- Goodfellow, 2014, NIPS
- Gu, 2022, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10696
- Haliassos, 2021, CVPR, 5039
- He, 2016, CVPR, 770
- He, 2021, Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21, 2534
- He, 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28, 5464
- Ho, 2020, Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 6840
- Jeong, 2022, WACV, 48
- Jeong, 2022, ECCV, 76
- Ju, 2022, 2022 IEEE ICIP, 3465
- Karras, 2018, ICLR
- Karras, 2019, CVPR, 4401
- Karras, 2020, CVPR, 8110
- Lee, 2021, WACV, 3942
- 10.1109/WACV56688.2023.00139 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0898-1221(97)90029-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/wifs45029.2018 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2023, Unified frequency-assisted trans-former framework for detecting and grounding multi-modal manipulation
- Liu, 2023, Forgery-aware adaptive transformer for generalizable synthetic image detection
- Liu, 2024, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications
- Liu, 2022, ICLR
- Liu, 2019, CVPR, 3673
- Liu, 2015, ICCV, 3730
- Lučić, 2019, ICML, 4183
- Luo, 2021, CVPR, 16317
- Mandelli, 2022, 2022 IEEE ICIP, 3091
- Marra, 2019, 2019 IEEE conference on multimedia information pro-cessing and retrieval (MIPR), 506, 10.1109/MIPR.2019.00103 · DOI · Paper page
- Masi, 2020, ECCV, 667
- Miyato, 2018, Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks
- Nichol, 2021, Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models
- Nichol, 2021, ICML, 8162
- Nie, 2019, ICLR
- Ojha, 2023, CVPR, 24480
- Park, 2019, CVPR, 2337
- Qian, 2020, ECCV, 86
- Ramesh, 2021, ICML, 8821
- Rombach, 2022, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 10684
- Rossler, 2019, Proceedings of the ICCV, 1
- Russakovsky, 2015, International journal of computer vision, 115, 211, 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · DOI · Paper page
- Schuhmann, 2021, Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs
- Shiohara, 2022, CVPR, 18720
- Tan, 2024, Data-independent operator: A training-free artifact representation extractor for generalizable deepfake detection
- Tan, 2023, CVPR (CVPR), 12105
- Wang, 2021, CVPR, 14923
- Wang, 2020, CVPR, 8695
- Wang, 2023, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 22445
- Woo, 2022, AAAI, 122
- Yu, 2015, Lsun: Construction of a large-scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop
- Yu, 2019, Proceedings of the ICCV, 7556
- Zhang, 2023, SIca: Slow learner with classifier alignment for continual learning on a pre-trained model, ICCV, 19148
- Zhang, 2019, 2019 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS), 1
- Zhou, 2016, CVPR, 2921
- Zhu, 2023, ICCV, 22257
- Zhu, 2020, ECCV, 592
- Zhu, 2017, ICCV, 2223
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, C., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Wei, S., Gu, G., Liu, P., & Wei, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
- Yanshan University (CN)
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Venue
- 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-06-16
- Pages
- 28130-28139
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402716164
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 14
- FWCI
- 46.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, open-set detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review