Cited by 225Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-Based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detection

Open access
Tan, Chuangchuang, Liu, Huan, Zhao, Yao, Wei, Shikui, Gu, Guanghua, Liu, Ping, Wei, Yunchao·2024·2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recently, the proliferation of highly realistic synthetic images, facilitated through a variety of GANs and Diffusions, has significantly heightened the susceptibility to misuse. While the primary focus of deepfake detection has traditionally centered on the design of detection algorithms, an investigative inquiry into the generator architectures has remained conspicuously absent in recent years. This paper contributes to this lacuna by rethinking the architectures of CNN-based generator, thereby establishing a generalized representation of synthetic artifacts. Our findings illuminate that the up-sampling operator can, beyond frequency-based artifacts, produce generalized forgery artifacts. In particular, the local interdependence among image pixels caused by upsampling operators is significantly demon-strated in synthetic images generated by GAN or diffusion. Building upon this observation, we introduce the concept of Neighboring Pixel Relationships(NPR) as a means to capture and characterize the generalized structural artifacts stemming from up-sampling operations. A comprehensive analysis is conducted on an open-world dataset, comprising samples generated by 28 distinct generative models. This analysis culminates in the establishment of a novel state-of-the-art performance, showcasing a remarkable 12.8% im-provement over existing methods. The code is available at https://github.com/chuangchuangtan/NPR-DeepfakeDetection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02657

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequency spectrum of GAN-generated images often contains distinctive patterns - 'checkerboards', particularly in the middle and high-frequency bands.

    “Several studies have shown that the frequency spectrum of GAN-generated images often contains distinctive patterns - 'checkerboards', particularly in the middle and high-frequency bands [85-89].”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [89]

    Section 2.2 describes frequency-spectrum representations of GAN up-sampling artifacts, and Section 3.3 notes diverse frequency-domain patterns in GAN images. Neither passage identifies those patterns as checkerboards or locates them particularly in the middle and high-frequency bands; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 225

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Bellemare, 2017, The cramer distance as a solution to biased wasserstein gradients
  2. Berthelot, 2017, Began: Boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks
  3. Brock, 2018, ICLR
  4. Cao, 2022, CVPR, 4113
  5. Chai, 2020, ECCV, 103
  6. Chen, 2022, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  7. Chen, 2022, CVPR, 18710
  8. Choi, 2018, CVPR, 8789
  9. Chuangchuang, 2024, Gangen-detection: A dataset generated by gans for gener-alizable deepfake detection.
  10. Dhariwal, 2021, Advances in neural information processing systems, 34, 8780
  11. Durall, 2020, CVPR, 7890
  12. Frank, 2020, ICML, 3247
  13. Goodfellow, 2014, NIPS
  14. Gu, 2022, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10696
  15. Haliassos, 2021, CVPR, 5039
  16. He, 2016, CVPR, 770
  17. He, 2021, Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21, 2534
  18. He, 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28, 5464
  19. Ho, 2020, Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 6840
  20. Jeong, 2022, WACV, 48
  21. Jeong, 2022, ECCV, 76
  22. Ju, 2022, 2022 IEEE ICIP, 3465
  23. Karras, 2018, ICLR
  24. Karras, 2019, CVPR, 4401
  25. Karras, 2020, CVPR, 8110
  26. Lee, 2021, WACV, 3942
  27. 10.1109/WACV56688.2023.00139 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/s0898-1221(97)90029-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/wifs45029.2018 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Liu, 2023, Unified frequency-assisted trans-former framework for detecting and grounding multi-modal manipulation
  32. Liu, 2023, Forgery-aware adaptive transformer for generalizable synthetic image detection
  33. Liu, 2024, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications
  34. Liu, 2022, ICLR
  35. Liu, 2019, CVPR, 3673
  36. Liu, 2015, ICCV, 3730
  37. Lučić, 2019, ICML, 4183
  38. Luo, 2021, CVPR, 16317
  39. Mandelli, 2022, 2022 IEEE ICIP, 3091
  40. Marra, 2019, 2019 IEEE conference on multimedia information pro-cessing and retrieval (MIPR), 506, 10.1109/MIPR.2019.00103 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Masi, 2020, ECCV, 667
  42. Miyato, 2018, Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks
  43. Nichol, 2021, Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models
  44. Nichol, 2021, ICML, 8162
  45. Nie, 2019, ICLR
  46. Ojha, 2023, CVPR, 24480
  47. Park, 2019, CVPR, 2337
  48. Qian, 2020, ECCV, 86
  49. Ramesh, 2021, ICML, 8821
  50. Rombach, 2022, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 10684
  51. Rossler, 2019, Proceedings of the ICCV, 1
  52. Russakovsky, 2015, International journal of computer vision, 115, 211, 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · DOI · Paper page
  53. Schuhmann, 2021, Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs
  54. Shiohara, 2022, CVPR, 18720
  55. Tan, 2024, Data-independent operator: A training-free artifact representation extractor for generalizable deepfake detection
  56. Tan, 2023, CVPR (CVPR), 12105
  57. Wang, 2021, CVPR, 14923
  58. Wang, 2020, CVPR, 8695
  59. Wang, 2023, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 22445
  60. Woo, 2022, AAAI, 122
  61. Yu, 2015, Lsun: Construction of a large-scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop
  62. Yu, 2019, Proceedings of the ICCV, 7556
  63. Zhang, 2023, SIca: Slow learner with classifier alignment for continual learning on a pre-trained model, ICCV, 19148
  64. Zhang, 2019, 2019 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS), 1
  65. Zhou, 2016, CVPR, 2921
  66. Zhu, 2023, ICCV, 22257
  67. Zhu, 2020, ECCV, 592
  68. Zhu, 2017, ICCV, 2223

Metadata

Authors
Tan, C., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Wei, S., Gu, G., Liu, P., & Wei, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Yanshan University (CN)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-06-16
Pages
28130-28139
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402716164
Cited by
225
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 14
FWCI
46.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
deepfake detection, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, open-set detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review