Stop learning it all to mitigate visual hallucination, Focus on the hallucination target
Open accessAbstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently suffer from hallucination issues, generating information about objects that are not present in input images during vision-language tasks. These hallucinations particularly undermine model reliability in practical applications requiring accurate object identification. To address this challenge, we propose TL-DPO, a preference learning approach that mitigates hallucinations by focusing on targeted areas where they occur. To implement this, we build a dataset containing hallucinated responses, correct responses, and target information (i.e., objects present in the images and the corresponding chunk positions in responses affected by hallucinations). By applying a preference learning method restricted to these specific targets, the model can filter out irrelevant signals and focus on correcting hallucinations. This allows the model to produce more factual responses by concentrating solely on relevant information. Experimental results demonstrate that TL-DPO effectively reduces hallucinations across multiple vision hallucination tasks, improving the reliability and performance of MLLMs without diminishing overall performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work for VLMs has explored techniques to repair captioning errors prior to returning them during the generation process or post-hoc verification, but these techniques can induce further errors during correction, rather than providing a higher-precision output that only includes details that are likely correct.
“While recent work for VLMs has explored techniques to repair captioning errors prior to returning them during the generation process (e.g., controlling what objects are mentioned [144]; strategically adjusting model weights [78, 108, 136, 141] or fi ne-tuning [22, 146]; sampling multiple patches [29]; guided decoding [150]; backtracking when uncertain [40, 131]) or post-hoc verification [139, 155]”
From "It's trained by non-disabled people": Evaluating How Image Quality Affects Product Captioning with Vision-Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [141]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29771 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.175 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.20 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02484 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.460 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01310 · DOI
- Authors
- Yoon, D., Song, Y., & Park, W.
- Affiliations
- SIONIC AI
- Venue
- 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-06-10
- Pages
- 4200-4208
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413147092
- Semantic Scholar
- bcd7ed129d9c99ee71e1f1f23dd3191d371c90d0
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- visual hallucinations, multimodal large language models, hallucination mitigation, preference learning, DPO, vision-language tasks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review