Cited by 1Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsNatural Language Processing TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Stop learning it all to mitigate visual hallucination, Focus on the hallucination target

Open access
Yoon, Dokyoon, Song, Youngsook, Park, Woomyong·2025·2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently suffer from hallucination issues, generating information about objects that are not present in input images during vision-language tasks. These hallucinations particularly undermine model reliability in practical applications requiring accurate object identification. To address this challenge, we propose TL-DPO, a preference learning approach that mitigates hallucinations by focusing on targeted areas where they occur. To implement this, we build a dataset containing hallucinated responses, correct responses, and target information (i.e., objects present in the images and the corresponding chunk positions in responses affected by hallucinations). By applying a preference learning method restricted to these specific targets, the model can filter out irrelevant signals and focus on correcting hallucinations. This allows the model to produce more factual responses by concentrating solely on relevant information. Experimental results demonstrate that TL-DPO effectively reduces hallucinations across multiple vision hallucination tasks, improving the reliability and performance of MLLMs without diminishing overall performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00397

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work for VLMs has explored techniques to repair captioning errors prior to returning them during the generation process or post-hoc verification, but these techniques can induce further errors during correction, rather than providing a higher-precision output that only includes details that are likely correct.

    “While recent work for VLMs has explored techniques to repair captioning errors prior to returning them during the generation process (e.g., controlling what objects are mentioned [144]; strategically adjusting model weights [78, 108, 136, 141] or fi ne-tuning [22, 146]; sampling multiple patches [29]; guided decoding [150]; backtracking when uncertain [40, 131]) or post-hoc verification [139, 155]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29771 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.175 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.20 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02484 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.460 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01310 · DOI

Authors
Yoon, D., Song, Y., & Park, W.
Affiliations
SIONIC AI
Venue
2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-06-10
Pages
4200-4208
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413147092
Cited by
1
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
visual hallucinations, multimodal large language models, hallucination mitigation, preference learning, DPO, vision-language tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review