The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Argus: Vision-Centric Reasoning with Grounded Chain-of-Thought
Abstract
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in vision-language tasks, yet they often struggle with vision-centric scenarios where precise visual focus is needed for accurate reasoning. In this paper, we introduce Argus to address these limitations with a new visual attention grounding mechanism. Our approach employs object-centric grounding as visual chain-of-thought signals, enabling more effective goal-conditioned visual attention during multimodal reasoning tasks. Evaluations on diverse benchmarks demonstrate that Argus excels in both multi-modal reasoning tasks and referring object grounding tasks. Extensive analysis further validates various design choices of Argus, and reveals the effectiveness of explicit language-guided visual region-of-interest engagement in MLLMs, highlighting the importance of advancing multimodal intelligence from a visual-centric perspective.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Visual CoT methods operate on a fixed image and remain reasoning-centric.
“Recent works such as Visual CoT prompting (Chen et al., 2024), ARGUS (Man et al., 2025), ReFocus (Fu et al., 2025), Chain-of-Spot (Liu et al., 2024d), GRIT (Fan et al., 2025), and spatial-reasoning studies (Zhong et al., 2026b; Zhu et al., 2026) improve multimodal reasoning by generating grounded reasoning chains or editing visual evidence, yet they operate on a fixed image and remain reasoning-”
From ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Man et al., 2025
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning
Zhu, M., Zhong, H., Zhao, C., Du, Z., Liu, M., Huang, Z., Li, A., Chen, H., Zou, C., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.21457
Metadata
- Authors
- Man, Y., Huang, D.-A., Liu, G., Sheng, S., Liu, S., Gui, L.-Y., Kautz, J., Wang, Y.-X., & Yu, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-06-10
- Pages
- 14268-14280
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413146697
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- multimodal large language models, visual reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review