Cited by 2Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Argus: Vision-Centric Reasoning with Grounded Chain-of-Thought

Man, Yunze, Huang, De-An, Liu, Guilin, Sheng, Shiwei, Liu, Shilong, Gui, Liang-Yan, Kautz, Jan, Wang, Yu-Xiong, Yu, Zhiding·2025·2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in vision-language tasks, yet they often struggle with vision-centric scenarios where precise visual focus is needed for accurate reasoning. In this paper, we introduce Argus to address these limitations with a new visual attention grounding mechanism. Our approach employs object-centric grounding as visual chain-of-thought signals, enabling more effective goal-conditioned visual attention during multimodal reasoning tasks. Evaluations on diverse benchmarks demonstrate that Argus excels in both multi-modal reasoning tasks and referring object grounding tasks. Extensive analysis further validates various design choices of Argus, and reveals the effectiveness of explicit language-guided visual region-of-interest engagement in MLLMs, highlighting the importance of advancing multimodal intelligence from a visual-centric perspective.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.01331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visual CoT methods operate on a fixed image and remain reasoning-centric.

    “Recent works such as Visual CoT prompting (Chen et al., 2024), ARGUS (Man et al., 2025), ReFocus (Fu et al., 2025), Chain-of-Spot (Liu et al., 2024d), GRIT (Fan et al., 2025), and spatial-reasoning studies (Zhong et al., 2026b; Zhu et al., 2026) improve multimodal reasoning by generating grounded reasoning chains or editing visual evidence, yet they operate on a fixed image and remain reasoning-”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Man, Y., Huang, D.-A., Liu, G., Sheng, S., Liu, S., Gui, L.-Y., Kautz, J., Wang, Y.-X., & Yu, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-06-10
Pages
14268-14280
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413146697
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
multimodal large language models, visual reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review