Cited by 445Face and Expression RecognitionNeural Networks and ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

Generalized Autoencoder: A Neural Network Framework for Dimensionality Reduction

Wang, Wei, Huang, Yan, Wang, Yizhou, Wang, Liang·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

Abstract

The autoencoder algorithm and its deep version as traditional dimensionality reduction methods have achieved great success via the powerful representability of neural networks. However, they just use each instance to reconstruct itself and ignore to explicitly model the data relation so as to discover the underlying effective manifold structure. In this paper, we propose a dimensionality reduction method by manifold learning, which iteratively explores data relation and use the relation to pursue the manifold structure. The method is realized by a so called "generalized autoencoder" (GAE), which extends the traditional autoencoder in two aspects: (1) each instance xi is used to reconstruct a set of instances {xj} rather than itself. (2) The reconstruction error of each instance (||xj -- x'i||2) is weighted by a relational function of xi and xj defined on the learned manifold. Hence, the GAE captures the structure of the data space through minimizing the weighted distances between reconstructed instances and the original ones. The generalized autoencoder provides a general neural network framework for dimensionality reduction. In addition, we propose a multilayer architecture of the generalized autoencoder called deep generalized autoencoder to handle highly complex datasets. Finally, to evaluate the proposed methods, we perform extensive experiments on three datasets. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods achieve promising performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw.2014.79

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
496-503
OpenAlex
W2042970394
Cited by
445
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9
FWCI
7.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
dimensionality reduction, manifold learning, autoencoder, relational function, manifold structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review