Cited by 27Advanced Image Processing TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep wavelet network with domain adaptation for single image demoiréing

Luo, Xiaotong, Zhang, Jiangtao, Hong, Ming, Qu, Yanyun, Xie, Yuan, Li, Cuihua·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks have made a prominent progress in low-level image restoration tasks. Moire is a kind of high-frequency and irregular interference stripe that appears on the photosensitive element of digital cameras or scanners. It can bring in unpleasant colorful artifacts on images. In this paper, we propose a deep wavelet network with domain adaptation mechanism for single image demoireing, dubbed AWUDN. The feature mapping is mainly performed in the wavelet domain, which can not only cut down computation complexity, but also reduce information loss. Moreover, considering that the images provided by the challenge organizers have strong self-similarity, the global context block is adopted for the learning of feature dependency in different positions. Finally, we introduce the domain adaptation mechanism to fine-tune the pretrained model for reducing the domain gap between training moire dataset and testing moire dataset. Benefiting from these improvements, the proposed method can achieve superior accuracy on the public testing dataset in the NTIRE 2020 Single Image Demoireing Challenge.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00218

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. gao, 2019, Moiré pattern removal with multi-scale feature enhancing network, In ICME
  2. liu, 2015, Moiré pattern removal from texture images via low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition, Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Luo, X., Zhang, J., Hong, M., Qu, Y., Xie, Y., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • East China Normal University (CN)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
1687-1694
OpenAlex
W3034651384
Cited by
24
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
domain adaptation, pre-trained model fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review