Radar Camera Fusion via Representation Learning in Autonomous Driving
Open accessAbstract
Radars and cameras are mature, cost-effective, and robust sensors and have been widely used in the perception stack of mass-produced autonomous driving systems. Due to their complementary properties, outputs from radar detection (radar pins) and camera perception (2D bounding boxes) are usually fused to generate the best perception results. The key to successful radar-camera fusion is the accurate data association. The challenges in the radar-camera association can be attributed to the complexity of driving scenes, the noisy and sparse nature of radar measurements, and the depth ambiguity from 2D bounding boxes. Traditional rule-based association methods are susceptible to performance degradation in challenging scenarios and failure in corner cases. In this study, we propose to address radar-camera association via deep representation learning, to explore feature-level interaction and global reasoning. Additionally, we design a loss sampling mechanism and an innovative ordinal loss to overcome the difficulty of imperfect labeling and to enforce critical human-like reasoning. Despite being trained with noisy labels generated by a rule-based algorithm, our proposed method achieves a performance of 92.2% F1 score, which is 11.6% higher than the rule-based teacher. Moreover, this data-driven method also lends itself to continuous improvement via corner case mining.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RCBEVDet dynamically aligns radar and camera BEV features with Cross Attention Multi-Layer Fusion Module.
“RCBEVDet [102] dynamically aligns radar and camera BEV features with the Cross Attention Multi-Layer Fusion Module (CAMF).”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Dong, X., Zhuang, B., Mao, Y., & Liu, L.
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-06
- Pages
- 1672-1681
- OpenAlex
- W3186789454
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- radar-camera fusion, autonomous driving perception, data association, representation learning, label noise, 2D bounding boxes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review