Cited by 442Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

AnoDDPM: Anomaly Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models using Simplex Noise

Open access
Wyatt, Julian, Leach, Adam, Schmon, Sebastian M., Willcocks, Chris G.·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Generative models have been shown to provide a powerful mechanism for anomaly detection by learning to model healthy or normal reference data which can subsequently be used as a baseline for scoring anomalies. In this work we consider denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) for unsupervised anomaly detection. DDPMs have superior mode coverage over generative adversarial networks (GANs) and higher sample quality than variational autoencoders (VAEs). However, this comes at the expense of poor scalability and increased sampling times due to the long Markov chain sequences required. We observe that within reconstruction-based anomaly detection a full-length Markov chain diffusion is not required. This leads us to develop a novel partial diffusion anomaly detection strategy that scales to high-resolution imagery, named AnoDDPM. A secondary problem is that Gaussian diffusion fails to capture larger anomalies; therefore we develop a multi-scale simplex noise diffusion process that gives control over the target anomaly size. AnoDDPM with simplex noise is shown to significantly outperform both f-AnoGAN and Gaussian diffusion for the tumorous dataset of 22 T1-weighted MRI scans (CCBS Edinburgh) qualitatively and quantitatively (improvement of +25.5% Sørensen–Dice coefficient, +17.6% IoU and +7.4% AUC).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00080

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In comparison to GAN-based methods, AnoDDPM with simplex noise can also capture large anomaly regions without the need for large datasets.

    “In comparison to GANbased methods, AnoDDPM with simplex noise can also capture large anomaly regions without the need for large datasets.”

    From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

  • AnoDDPM is the first to apply the diffusion model to industrial image anomaly detection.

    “AnoDDPM [113] is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to apply the diffusion model to industrial image anomaly detection.”

    From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyatt, J., Leach, A., Schmon, S. M., & Willcocks, C. G.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
649-655
OpenAlex
W4292851291
Cited by
442
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 42
FWCI
46.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
anomaly detection, denoising diffusion probabilistic models, unsupervised anomaly detection, reconstruction-based anomaly detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review