AnoDDPM: Anomaly Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models using Simplex Noise
Open accessAbstract
Generative models have been shown to provide a powerful mechanism for anomaly detection by learning to model healthy or normal reference data which can subsequently be used as a baseline for scoring anomalies. In this work we consider denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) for unsupervised anomaly detection. DDPMs have superior mode coverage over generative adversarial networks (GANs) and higher sample quality than variational autoencoders (VAEs). However, this comes at the expense of poor scalability and increased sampling times due to the long Markov chain sequences required. We observe that within reconstruction-based anomaly detection a full-length Markov chain diffusion is not required. This leads us to develop a novel partial diffusion anomaly detection strategy that scales to high-resolution imagery, named AnoDDPM. A secondary problem is that Gaussian diffusion fails to capture larger anomalies; therefore we develop a multi-scale simplex noise diffusion process that gives control over the target anomaly size. AnoDDPM with simplex noise is shown to significantly outperform both f-AnoGAN and Gaussian diffusion for the tumorous dataset of 22 T1-weighted MRI scans (CCBS Edinburgh) qualitatively and quantitatively (improvement of +25.5% Sørensen–Dice coefficient, +17.6% IoU and +7.4% AUC).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In comparison to GAN-based methods, AnoDDPM with simplex noise can also capture large anomaly regions without the need for large datasets.
“In comparison to GANbased methods, AnoDDPM with simplex noise can also capture large anomaly regions without the need for large datasets.”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [113]
AnoDDPM is the first to apply the diffusion model to industrial image anomaly detection.
“AnoDDPM [113] is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to apply the diffusion model to industrial image anomaly detection.”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [113]
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 · doi:10.5244/c.30.87 · Cited by 7,244 · see citing works
Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis
Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05233 · Cited by 3,362 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications
Yang, L., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Hong, S., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Cui, B., & Yang, M.-H. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3626235 · Cited by 1,704 · see citing works
Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Liu, J., Xie, G., Wang, J., Li, S., Wang, C., Zheng, F., & Jin, Y. (2024) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1459-z · Cited by 463 · see citing works
ZUMA: Training-Free Zero-Shot Unified Multimodal Anomaly Detection
Ma, Y., Liu, M., Jiang, S., Zhou, J., Bian, Y., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3658856 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wyatt, J., Leach, A., Schmon, S. M., & Willcocks, C. G.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 649-655
- OpenAlex
- W4292851291
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 42
- FWCI
- 46.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, denoising diffusion probabilistic models, unsupervised anomaly detection, reconstruction-based anomaly detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review