Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning Leveraging Self-Supervised Features
Abstract
Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning (FSCIL) is a recently introduced Class Incremental Learning (CIL) setting that operates under more constrained assumptions: only very few samples per class are available in each incremental session, and the number of samples/classes is known ahead of time. Due to limited data for class incremental learning, FSCIL suffers more from over-fitting and catastrophic forgetting than general CIL. In this paper we study leveraging the advances due to self-supervised learning to remedy overfitting and catastrophic forgetting and significantly advance the state-of-the-art FSCIL. We explore training a lightweight feature fusion plus classifier on a concatenation of features emerging from supervised and self-supervised models. The supervised model is trained on data from a base session, where a relatively larger amount of data is available in FSCIL. Whereas a self-supervised model is learned using an abundance of unlabeled data. We demonstrate a classifier trained on the fusion of such features outperforms classifiers trained independently on either of these representations. We experiment with several existing self-supervised models and provide results for three popular benchmarks for FSCIL including Caltech-UCSD Birds-200-2011 (CUB200), miniImageNet, and CIFAR100 where we advance the state-ofthe-art for each benchmark. Code is available at: https://github.com/TouqeerAhmad/FeSSSS
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ahmad et al. [72] proposed a framework that combines self-supervised and supervised features.
“Ahmad et al. [72] proposed a framework that combines self-supervised and supervised features.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning
Rebuffi, S.-A., Kolesnikov, A., Sperl, G., & Lampert, C. H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.587 · Cited by 3,988 · see citing works
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks
Buda, M., Maki, A., & Mazurowski, M. A. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In [5], a comprehensive evaluation of recently proposed incremental learning approaches [2–4,8,25,26,30,36,42,48,56] was conducted.”
BackgroundUnsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotations
Gidaris, S., Singh, P., & Komodakis, N. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.07728 · Cited by 2,477 · see citing works
IL2M: Class Incremental Learning With Dual Memory
Belouadah, E., & Popescu, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00067 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Metric Learning for Large Scale Image Classification: Generalizing to New Classes at Near-Zero Cost
Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., & Csurka, G. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_35 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Unsupervised Pre-Training of Image Features on Non-Curated Data
Caron, M., Bojanowski, P., Mairal, J., & Joulin, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00305 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks
Belouadah, E., Popescu, A., & Kanellos, I. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.01844 · Cited by 235 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In [5], a comprehensive evaluation of recently proposed incremental learning approaches [2–4, 8, 25, 26, 30, 36, 42, 48, 56] was conducted.”
BackgroundAn Appraisal of Incremental Learning Methods
Luo, Y., Yin, L., Bai, W., & Mao, K. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22111190 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Silvén, O., Pietikäinen, M., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3529038 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“Furthermore, in the framework proposed by Ahmad et al. [72], the output nodes of the model increased with the number of classes involved in the current session.”
Influential
- Authors
- Ahmad, T., Dhamija, A. R., Cruz, S., Rabinowitz, R., Li, C., Jafarzadeh, M., & Boult, T. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-06
- Pages
- 3899-3909
- OpenAlex
- W4292787441
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- few-shot class-incremental learning, catastrophic forgetting, overfitting, self-supervised learning, feature fusion, unlabeled data, lightweight classifiers, continual learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review