Cited by 41Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Algorithms

Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning Leveraging Self-Supervised Features

Ahmad, Touqeer, Dhamija, Akshay Raj, Cruz, Steve, Rabinowitz, Ryan, Li, Chunchun, Jafarzadeh, Mohsen, Boult, Terrance E.·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning (FSCIL) is a recently introduced Class Incremental Learning (CIL) setting that operates under more constrained assumptions: only very few samples per class are available in each incremental session, and the number of samples/classes is known ahead of time. Due to limited data for class incremental learning, FSCIL suffers more from over-fitting and catastrophic forgetting than general CIL. In this paper we study leveraging the advances due to self-supervised learning to remedy overfitting and catastrophic forgetting and significantly advance the state-of-the-art FSCIL. We explore training a lightweight feature fusion plus classifier on a concatenation of features emerging from supervised and self-supervised models. The supervised model is trained on data from a base session, where a relatively larger amount of data is available in FSCIL. Whereas a self-supervised model is learned using an abundance of unlabeled data. We demonstrate a classifier trained on the fusion of such features outperforms classifiers trained independently on either of these representations. We experiment with several existing self-supervised models and provide results for three popular benchmarks for FSCIL including Caltech-UCSD Birds-200-2011 (CUB200), miniImageNet, and CIFAR100 where we advance the state-ofthe-art for each benchmark. Code is available at: https://github.com/TouqeerAhmad/FeSSSS

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00435

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, T., Dhamija, A. R., Cruz, S., Rabinowitz, R., Li, C., Jafarzadeh, M., & Boult, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
3899-3909
OpenAlex
W4292787441
Cited by
41
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
few-shot class-incremental learning, catastrophic forgetting, overfitting, self-supervised learning, feature fusion, unlabeled data, lightweight classifiers, continual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review