Cited by 120Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Denoising Pretraining for Semantic Segmentation

Brempong, Emmanuel Asiedu, Kornblith, Simon, Chen, Ting, Parmar, Niki, Minderer, Matthias, Norouzi, Mohammad·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Semantic segmentation labels are expensive and time consuming to acquire. To improve label efficiency of semantic segmentation models, we revisit denoising autoencoders and study the use of a denoising objective for pretraining UNets. We pretrain a Transformer-based UNet as a denoising autoencoder, followed by fine-tuning on semantic segmentation using few labeled examples. Denoising pretraining outperforms training from random initialization, and even supervised ImageNet-21K pretraining of the encoder when the number of labeled images is small. A key advantage of denoising pretraining over supervised pretraining of the backbone is the ability to pretrain the decoder, which would otherwise be randomly initialized. We thus propose a novel Decoder Denoising Pretraining (DDeP) method, in which we initialize the encoder using supervised learning and pretrain only the decoder using the denoising objective. Despite its simplicity, DDeP achieves state-of-the-art results on label-efficient semantic segmentation, offering considerable gains on the Cityscapes, Pascal Context, and ADE20K datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00462

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diffusion models have shown potential in computer vision, natural language processing, temporal data modeling, multi-modal modeling, robust machine learning, computational chemistry, and medical image reconstruction.

    “and have also shown potential in a variety of domains, ranging from computer vision [2,11,19,23,88,90,113,115,134,150,160,173,198,200,248,270,271,283,290], natural language processing [6,93,139,205,275], temporal data modeling [1,33,124,191,233,262], multi-modal modeling [7,186,196,199,288], robust machine learning [18,28,112,242,273], to interdisciplinary applications in fields such as computa”
  • Decoder Denoising Pretraining integrates diffusion models with denoising autoencoders and delivers promising results on label-efficient semantic segmentation.

    “Similarly, Decoder Denoising Pretraining (DDeP) [19] integrates diffusion models with denoising autoencoders [241] and delivers promising results on label-efficient semantic segmentation.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 120

Authors
Brempong, E. A., Kornblith, S., Chen, T., Parmar, N., Minderer, M., & Norouzi, M.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
4174-4185
OpenAlex
W4292829030
Cited by
120
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 23
FWCI
15.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
semantic segmentation, denoising autoencoder, U-Net, label efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review